Missouri Clean Water Commission Must Contain One Independent or Minor Party Member

In 2002, the Missouri Clean Water Commission was expanded from 6 members to 7 members. Unchanged at that time was an earlier law, that no more than 3 members of any political party sit on that Commission.

Recently the Sierra Club noticed that the Missouri Water Commission has 4 Republicans and 3 Democrats, and brought this to the attention of the press. Missouri Governor Matt Blunt pooh-poohed the problem, saying it is only “common sense” that one major party must be allowed to have 4 members on the Commission, notwithstanding the clear language of the law. The Sierra Club, in response, pointed out that the Governor is free to appoint an independent, or a member of some party other than the Democratic and Republican Parties.

Missouri does not have registration by party, so it is sometimes somewhat unclear how to characterize any individual’s party affiliation. Thanks to Eric Dondero for this story.

Chicago Mayor's Petitions Challenged

On December 26, a challenge was filed to the petitions submitted to place Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley on the ballot. Chicago requires 12,500 signatures for anyone to get on the ballot in any citywide race. The elections have been non-partisan starting in 1999. Before 1999, Democrats and Republicans needed far fewer signatures, whereas everyone else needed 25,000.

Mayor Daley submitted 24,000 to meet the requirement of 12,500, so it is unlikely that the individual who challenged his petition will be able to show the petition is invalid.

The election is February 27, 2007. Five candidates for Mayor filed petitions; three of those five are being challenged.

Chicago Mayor’s Petitions Challenged

On December 26, a challenge was filed to the petitions submitted to place Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley on the ballot. Chicago requires 12,500 signatures for anyone to get on the ballot in any citywide race. The elections have been non-partisan starting in 1999. Before 1999, Democrats and Republicans needed far fewer signatures, whereas everyone else needed 25,000.

Mayor Daley submitted 24,000 to meet the requirement of 12,500, so it is unlikely that the individual who challenged his petition will be able to show the petition is invalid.

The election is February 27, 2007. Five candidates for Mayor filed petitions; three of those five are being challenged.

Washington Secretary of State Proposes Mixed Revision of Ballot Access Laws

Washington Secretary of State Sam Reed plans to ask the legislature to revise Washington state procedures for ballot access for unqualified parties and independent candidates.

Currently, Washington state has a peculiar system that requires “conventions” of specified minimum numbers of voters in attendance, for independent candidates and the candidates of unqualified parties. These include 1,000 “attendees” for statewide office and down to 25 “attendees” for state legislature.

Since the state has always permitted outdoor “conventions”, in which anyone walking by who signs the roster is considered to be “attending”, this idea has long been rather silly. The Secretary of State proposes to give up the label “convention” and permit a straightforward petition. He proposes 1,000 signatures for statewide office, 500 for U.S. House, and 100 for state legislature and county office.

Unfortunately, he is also proposing to bring back the primary vote hurdle. Between 1978 and 2002, it wasn’t enough for independent candidates, and the candidates of unqualified parties, to show support at their own “conventions”. Such a showing of support only put them on the September primary ballot (except presidential candidates were exempt). Then they had to poll 1% in the September primary, as a condition of being on the November ballot. The September vote showing was held unconstitutional in 2004. A somewhat similar law was also struck down that year in Minnesota. Now Sam Reed proposes to bring it back, but with a smaller vote requirement (1,000 primary votes for statewide office, 500 for U.S. House, 100 for other partisan office).

National Popular Vote Plan Has Sponsors in 47 States

The National Popular Vote Plan organization has found legislators to introduce its model bill in 47 of the 50 states. Almost all of these bills will be introduced in the first month that state legislatures convene in 2007. For most states, this is January 2007. The National Popular Vote Plan, described on this page in the past, is a means to bring about a presidential election system in which the person who receives the most popular votes nationwide will also win the electoral college.