Late in the day on Wednesday, October 23, U.S. District Court Judge Michael Watson, a Bush Jr. appointee, issued a two-page order in Stein v LaRose, s.d., 2:24cv-04042. As he had said orally the day before, he said he would abstain and wait for the case to be resolved in state court. He directed that the results of the state court proceeding should be reported to him, implying that he would decide the case afterwards should either side be dissatisfied with the state court outcome. Here is the two-page order.
This year, the North Carolina Libertarian Party has 28 nominees on the ballot for state legislative seats. That is more than any other minor party in any state. This post is not including minor party nominees who are also major party nominees in the tally.
Lawrence Couny, Indiana election officials mistakenly printed ballots that label the three Libertarian candidates for County Council as independent candidates. See this story. The county is reprinting ballots and sending out corrected ballots.
This Illinois news story points out that Illinois has no minor party presidential candidates this year, although independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is on the ballot.
The story does not say that this is the first presidential election since 1964 in which Illinois has had no minor party candidates on the ballot, but that is an accurate statement which the author could have said.
In 1964 only the Democratic and Republican nominees were on in Illinois. The Socialist Labor Party pad petitioned,, and no one challenged its petition validity. But it was still kept off because at the time, Illinois had a law requiring a new party to run a full slate of candidates. That year the entire Illinois House was being elected at-large. The Socialist Labor Party petition did not list any candidates for State House. The challengers successfully argued that the petition was invalid because it didn’t include 177 candidates for State House.
The reason the entire house was being elected at-large is that the legislature had failed to pass a redistricting bill that didn’t violate one person, one vote.
On October 22, U.S. District Court Judge Michael Watson held a hearing in Stein v LaRose. At the conclusion, he stated from the bench that he believes the issue belongs in state court, and said Stein should have gone to the State Supreme Court. The issue is whether votes for Stein should be counted. She is on the ballot but the Secretary of State says her votes won’t be counted because someone not officially part of the Stein campaign filed a withdrawal of the vice-presidential nominee.