Georgia State Senator Buddy Carter (R-Pooler) has introduced SB 3, to provide for non-partisan elections for county offices.
Reply
The Las Vegas Review-Journal has this story about Roseanne Barr, including the fact that she recently said she intends to run for President in 2016. Thanks to James Ogle for the link.
Indiana State Senator Mike Delph (R-Carmel) has introduced SB 51. It eliminates the straight-ticket device.
On January 18, a subcommittee of the Virginia Senate Privileges and Elections Committee passed SB 690 by 4-2. The bill lowers the number of signatures for presidential candidates (both in presidential primaries and in the general election) from 10,000 signatures to 5,000 signatures. Now it goes to the full committee.
The full committee on the same day defeated SB 964, which would have changed the poll-closing hour from 7 p.m. to 8 p.m. See this story. Thanks to Shelley Tamres for the news about SB 690. UPDATE: see this story about the bill, which says that Democratic Senator J. Chapman Petersen voted against the ballot access bill because the ballot would be too cluttered if it passes. Actually, before 1970, Virginia only required 1,000 signatures for presidential candidates in the general election, and Virginia has never had a general election ballot with more than seven presidential candidates.
On January 18, the California State Court of Appeals released a 14-page opinion, finding that AB 1499, which was signed into law in 2012, was improperly permitted to go into effect immediately. AB 1499 changed the order in which statewide ballot measures appear on the ballot. Because AB 1499 went into effect immediately, it caused the November 2012 ballot to be different than it would otherwise have been. The bill caused the Governor’s initiative to raise taxes to be listed first among all the statewide measures, and put a competing tax increase measure near the bottom of the list of statewide ballot questions.
The California Constitution says bills don’t take effect immediately unless they pass with a two-thirds majority in each house, and AB 1499 did not obtain such support in the legislature. But the Constitution makes an exception for budget bills. AB 1499, when passed, made an appropriation of $1,000. But the decision says that AB 1499 (in the form in which it passed) did not exist when the state budget passed, so AB 1499 cannot be considered part of the budget. The decision has no effect on the 2012 election, and only influences future events. The decision is Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association v Bowen, C071506. Here is a news story about the decision.