Highest New York State Court Won’t Hear Robert F. Kennedy, Jr’s Ballot Access Case

On September 10, the New York State Court of Appeals, the highest state court, refused to hear Cartwright v Kennedy. This is the case in which the lower state courts had ruled that Kennedy can’t be on the ballot because he didn’t really live at the address he listed on his declaration of candidacy.

Kennedy has a case in federal court in New York, but if he doesn’t win that, New York will be the only state in the nation with only two presidential candidates’ names on the November 2024 ballot, something that the New York newspapers have not mentioned. Kennedy is on in Illinois, and many candidates are on in Tennessee, and Chase Oliver is on the ballot in the other 47 states, along with many other presidential candidates in most cases. Oliver is not on in the District of Columbia either, but Kennedy is.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Files Federal Lawsuit to Remove Name from Michigan Ballot

On September 10, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. filed a federal lawsuit against the Michigan Secretary of State, seeking to remove his name from the ballot. The state courts had ruled he could not withdraw. Kennedy v Benson, e.d., 2:24cv-12375. The case is assigned to U.S. District Court Judge Denise R. Hood, a Clinton appointee.

Here is the Complaint.

Presidential Elector Candidates for Shiva Ayyadurai Sue Tennessee for Ballot Access

On September 10, presidential elector candidates pledged to Shiva Ayyadurai filed a federal lawsuit against the Secretary of State of Tennessee. Although their independent presidential petition had enough valid signatures, the Secretary disqualified them because they say they are pledged to Ayyadurai, who was born in India.

The case is Lupo v Tennessee Secretary of State, m.d., 3:24cv-1088. It is assigned to U.S. District Court Judge Waverly Crenshaw, an Obama appointee. Here is the Complaint.

Missouri Supreme Court Puts Initiative Back on Ballot

On September 10, the Missouri Supreme Court restored an initiative concerning abortion to the ballot. A lower court had removed it on September 6. Coleman v Ashcroft, SC 100742. The challengers had claimed that the initiative had failed to list all the existing Missouri laws that would be repealed or amended if the initiative passed. The Supreme Court did not explain its reasoning, but said it would do that later. The court order does not say if the court order is unanimous or not.