Presidential Elector Candidates Pledged to Shiva Ayyadurai Sue Wisconsin Over Ballot Access

On August 27, the Wisconsin Elections Commission removed Shiva Ayyadurai from the ballot as an independent candidate for president. He has enough valid signatures but he was challenged on the grounds that he was born in India. On August 28, two of his candidates for presidential elector filed a federal lawsuit to regain ballot access for themselves and for Ayyadurai. Here is the Complaint.

It argues that the candidates for presidential elector (themselves), are qualified candidates, and there is no basis to block them from running for presidential elector. It also argues that the objectors did not notify them of the challenge, and that therefore the objection is flawed. The case is assigned to U.S. District Court Judge William C. Griesbach, a Bush Jr. appointee.

Similar lawsuits related to the Ayyadurai candidacy are being filed in other states where the petition had enough valid signatures.

Moscow Times Carries Story on Restrictive Russian Ballot Access Laws

The Moscow Times has this story about repressive ballot access laws in Russia. It is authored by Yelena Kotyonochkina, a former Moscow municipal deputy who now lives outside Russia.

The Moscow Times was formerly a print and on-line newspaper in Russia,, but it has been banned by the government and now is an on-line newspaper situated outside Russia.

Nevada Supreme Court Removes the Green Party from the Ballot

On September 6, the Nevada Supreme Court voted 5-2 to remove the Green Party from the ballot. Nevada State Democratic Party v Nevada Green Party, 24 OC 00107.1B. The lower court had kept the party on the ballot. Here is the 18-page opinion.

When the Green Party began its petition drive, the Nevada Secretary of State furnished a sample form. But, the Nevada Secretary of State sent an incorrect version. The petition blank should have contained a sentence saying the circulator attests that, to his or her belief, all the signatures were of registered voters. The petition blank for initiatives does not have such a requirement. Furthermore the requirement that this sentence be included is not mentioned in the election law; it is only a regulation.

The court majority acknowledges that the Secretary of State’s error was responsible, and says it was an “unfortunate mistake.” The majority acknowledges that Nevada precedent says substantial compliance is good enough. As the dissent points out, the missing sentence serves no useful purpose, because all the signatures were checked anyway and there were easily enough valid signatures.

This is an especially painful blow for the Green Party, because it almost certainly would have polled enough votes for one of its nominees to keep its spot on the ballot. Furthermore the decision completely eliminates the ability of Nevada voters to cast a vote for Jill Stein, because Nevada bans write-in votes.

Virginia State Board of Elections Reverses Itself and Adds Cornel West to Ballot

On September 6, the Virginia Board of Elections determined that Cornel West should be on the ballot after all. On August 29 it had determined that he had enough valid signatures but that he had not submitted certain paperwork. But the Board has now determined the problem with the missing paperwork was not the candidate’s fault.

The Board also removed Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. from the ballot, at his request. And it determined that Claudia De la Cruz, nominee of the Party for Socialism and Liberation, has enough valid signatures. The Board had already approved the Chase Oliver and Jill Stein petitions.