Michael Medved has this opinion piece, titled, “Constitution Kills Third Party Bid.” His thesis is that the electoral college makes it impossible for a new party to win the presidency, and therefore no new party will ever replace the Democratic and Republican Parties.

This ignores the fact that the U.S. had the same Constitution (for the most part) in the 19th century, and three times in the 19th century, a new party rose to power on the ashes of an old major party. The Federalist Party died out after 1818 and was replaced by the National Republican Party, the party that ran John Quincy Adams for President in 1828 and Henry Clay for President in 1832.

The National Republican Party died out after 1834 and was replaced by the Whig Party, which continued to exist until the eve of the Civil War, although it didn’t run anyone for President in 1856 and 1860. The Republican Party, which had been formed on July 6, 1854, quickly became a major party.

It is true that the Electoral College system injures a new party, by providing that if no one gets a majority of the electoral college vote, then the U.S. House picks the President, with each state getting one vote. Even though the newly-elected U.S. House, not the outgoing House, chooses the President in January (if no one received an electoral college majority in December), and even though in theory a new party could have also done well in the U.S. House elections, this is a significant problem for new major parties.

December 7 is the deadline in Ohio for petitions to get on the primary ballot. The Washington Times reported that Newt Gingrich probably would fail to submit petitions on time, but then other newspapers reported that the Washington Times is story is not really accurate.

Ohio doesn’t require any petitions for presidential candidates to appear on the primary ballot, but does require 50 signatures for the presidential candidate’s delegates from each U.S. House district, for major party presidential primaries. Because the presidential primary delegate selection process is tied to separate contests in each U.S. House district, it is possible for a candidate to be on the ballot in some U.S. House districts and not others. Also, it means that Ohio can’t hold a presidential primary until it has its U.S. House district boundaries settled.

Because Ohio is late to have its U.S. House district boundaries known for sure, the legislature passed a bill earlier this year moving the presidential primary and the U.S. House primary to June 14. So, even though under the existing law all presidential primary petitions are due today, along with U.S. House petitions, the Secretary of State expects to have a second, later deadline for those kind of petitions as soon as the district lines are settled. That is why Gingrich will get another chance to submit primary petitions later.

Here is the original Washington Times story, which is very worth reading, because it quotes various Republican Party leaders who say the ballot access process for presidential primaries is ridiculously complex and burdensome. And it is, but anyone who says the presidential primary petitioning process is too difficult really ought to look at the process for minor party and independent candidate ballot access. Here is a later story from the Cleveland Plain Dealer. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the links.

On November 6, New York’s Attorney General asked a U.S. District Court Judge in Albany to rule that the state must hold its non-presidential primary no later than August 18 (the statute says that primary should be in mid-September). But the state also is asking the judge not to choose any particular date earlier than August 18.

The hearing, which has been postponed three times, is now set for December 12. The Assembly, which has a Democratic majority, wants a June primary. The State Senate, which has a Republican majority, wants an August primary. See this story. Thanks to Bill Van Allen for the link.