U.S. Supreme Court Extends Time for New York Petitioner to File Cert Petition

Lori Maslow has obtained an extension of time in which to file a cert petition in the U.S. Supreme Court, over her case involving who can circulate a candidate petition in a primary election. Maslow and her husband are not registered to vote in the same party in New York. She wanted to help circulate her husband’s petition to get on the ballot in the primary, but state law made that illegal, because she is not a member of his political party. The 2nd circuit upheld the restriction that only members of a party may circulate candidate petitions to get on that party’s primary ballot.

Her cert petition would have been due in three days, but she has obtained an extension until January 31, 2012, to file. The case is Maslow v Board of Elections in the City of New York.

New Political Parties in Texas Have Less than a Week to File Notice of Intent

Texas currently has four ballot-qualified parties, Republican, Democratic, Libertarian, and Green. Any party that is not now qualified must submit a petition, due in June 2012. But, it may not circulate the petition unless it submits a form no later than January 2, 2012.

So far, the only unqualified parties that have filed this form are the Constitution, Generation, Christian, and Internet Action Parties. It is expected that Americans Elect, and probably others, will file the form soon.

How the Virginia Republican Party Could Expand Voter Choice in its 2012 Presidential Primary

The Virginia Republican Party, if it wished, could probably win a lawsuit against the ban on write-ins in its own 2012 presidential primary. Winning against the ban on write-ins would make it possible for Virginia voters who vote in that primary to have a free choice of candidates.

The Virginia Constitution, Article II, section 3, says, “In elections other than primary elections, provision shall be made whereby votes may be cast for persons other than the listed candidates or nominees.” Because this section protects write-in voting in general elections, all Virginia ballot-counting machines are able to handle write-in votes.

The only possible purpose for excluding primaries from the write-in guarantee is to protect the interest of parties. But a party that wants write-ins in its own primary ought to have the constitutional clout to demand it. The U.S. Supreme Court has protected the ability of political parties to control their own nomination process, especially in the recent party rights decision, New York State Board of Elections v Lopez Torres, 552 U.S. 196 (2008). Also, Virginia state courts have always recognized a strong role for political parties in the nominations process.

Virginia Attorney General Wants to Lower Presidential Primary Petition Requirement from 10,000 to 1,100 Signatures

On December 26, Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli wrote in his own newsletter that he recommends that the legislature lower the presidential primary petition requirement. Specifically, he advocates that the current 10,000 requirement be changed so that only 1,100 signatures are required, with at least 100 from each U.S. House district. See here. Thanks to Tony Roza and Carey Campbell for this news.

On January 17, a U.S. District Court in Virginia will hear arguments in Lux v Judd, which challenges the Virginia ballot access law that circulators for district office must live in that district. It will be interesting to see if the recent commentary on Virginia presidential primary ballot access influences the oral argument at that hearing.

Senator Cardin Releases More Details about U.S. Senate Bill on Ex-Felon Voting Rights

U.S. Senator Ben Cardin’s bill to expand voting rights in federal elections for ex-felons is described on the Senator’s web page here. The text of his bill, S2017, is still not available on the Library of Congress’s web page, but the bill is fully described at the link. The bill is co-sponsored by Senators Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.).