Louisiana State Court Asks Republican Party to Intervene in Case over March 2012 Election for Party Officers

In Louisiana, qualified political parties with at least 5% of the registration elect committee members at the presidential primary. Louisiana’s next presidential primary is March 24, 2012. Louisiana law expects these major parties to draw their own district boundaries for the election of state committeemembers. The Republican Party is still using districts for these internal party office elections that are based on the 2000 census.

Recently, a member of the Republican Party state committee filed a lawsuit against the Secretary of State to freeze the Republican Party committee member elections until the party draws new districts based in the 2010 census. See this story. On November 15, the judge in the case asked the Republican Party to intervene. If the Republican Party does not draw new districts, a fallback is to use the new legislative districts instead.

Canadian Supreme Court Asked to Hear Case on Voting Systems

Fairvote Canada, and the Association for the Revindication of Democratic Rights, have asked the Supreme Court of Canada to take a case that argues that winner-take-all elections violate the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. See this story. The lower court had upheld the existing Canadian system, which, like almost all elections in the United States, provides that whichever candidate gets the most votes is the winner.

Tenth Circuit Sets Oral Argument in Constitution Party Lawsuit over Kansas Voter Registration

The 10th circuit will hear Constitution Party of Kansas v Biggs, 11-3152, on January 18, 2012, Wednesday, at 9 a.m. in Denver. This is the case over whether Kansas must let voters register as members of parties that are not ballot-qualified but which are active in elections in that state. The Constitution Party placed its presidential nominee on the ballot in Kansas in 2004 using the independent candidate petition method, and in 2008 by having the ballot-qualified Kansas Reform Party nominate him.

Arizona Supreme Court Explains Why it Ruled Earlier that Recall Petition is Valid

On November 14, the Arizona Supreme Court issued this 21-page opinion, explaining why last month it ruled that the recall petition against State Senator Russell Pearce is valid. The case is Ross v Bennett, cv-11-0264. The decision explains that miniscule irregularities in the wording of the recall petition should not be used as a basis to invalidate the petition. For example, opponents of the recall had complained that the circulator’s statement should have said, “I affirm a belief that each signer was a qualified elector of the election district on the date indicated”, but the petitions actually said that the circulator affirms a belief that “each signer is qualified to vote in the recall election.” The decision is unanimous.

Ohio Referendum Petition on Omnibus Election Law Almost Certainly has Enough Valid Signatures

The Ohio Democratic Party to force a referendum on the 2011 omnibus election law bill almost certainly has enough valid signatures. It is very likely that Ohio voters will be voting on the measure on November 6, 2012. See this story. The story has a misleading title. Included in the omnibus election law bill was a provision easing the deadline for a new party to qualify for the ballot from four months before the primary, to three months before the primary. In September 2011, a U.S. District Court judge had ruled that although the new deadline is better than the old one, it is still unconstitutionally early.