U.S. Senate Subcommittee to Hold Hearings on “New State Voting Laws – Barriers to the Ballot?”

The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee has several subcommittees. The subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights will hold hearings in early September on “New State Voting Laws – Barriers to the Ballot?” The subcommittee has already chosen witnesses, and they appear to be individuals who will talk about state laws that require voters to show a photo ID in order to vote at the polls.

The subcommittee’s chair is Senator Dick Durbin (D-Illinois). Other Democrats on the subcommittee are Patrick Leahy of Vermont, Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, Al Franken of Minnesota, Christopher Coons of Delaware, and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut. Republican members of the subcommittee are Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Jon Kyl of Arizona, John Cornyn of Texas, Michael Lee of Utah, and Tom Coburn of Oklahoma. Thanks to Rick Hasen for this news.

Carl Lewis Decision Expected Momentarily

Carl Lewis, the former Olympic track star who is trying to get on the ballot to be the Democratic nominee for State Senate, New Jersey 8th district, and others, expect a ruling at any time in his federal case. See this story. An oral argument set for September 1 was cancelled by the judge, who will rule without any more hearings. The issue is whether Lewis meets the residency requirement of the New Jersey Constitution, and alternatively whether the New Jersey Constitution violates the U.S. Constitution. A state court has already determined that Lewis does not meet the residency requirement, which requires four years residence in the state. Lewis voted in California in 2009.

The election is November 8, 2011. Election officials must start printing the ballot no later than September 8.

Ohio Legislators Expect to Soon Introduce a Stand-Alone Bill to Move Presidential Primary from March to May

According to this story, Ohio Republican and Democratic state legislators agree on the need to soon introduce a stand-alone bill that moves the 2012 primary from March to May. The legislature already passed a bill to do this, but it was part of the omnibus election law bill that may be suspended if opponents of the omnibus election law bill get enough signatures by the end of September.

If the proposed bill really does nothing but move the 2012 primary from March to May, then the law would require 2012 petitions for newly qualifying parties to be due in the first week in January. By contrast, if nothing is done and the referendum petition fails, the deadline will be early February. And if the referendum petition succeeds and the proposed new bill does not pass, then the petition deadline would be November of the year before the election. Thus, without court action, that deadline is utterly unpredicatable. Of course, a court decision is expected very soon on the constitutionality of the deadline. Thanks to Frontloading HQ for the link.