Ohio 2012 Primary to be in March, not May

According to this story, and this story, on September 21, the Ohio Senate Government Oversight and Reform Committee killed HB 318. Also, the redistricting bill was amended to show that the primary date is March 6, 2012. As a result, the Ohio 2012 primary (for president and all other partisan office) will be in March, not May. This means that the statutory deadline for petitions to qualify a new party, in 2012, will be in December 2011, not February 2012.

On September 7, 2011, a U.S. District Court had ruled that even if the 2012 primary were in May 2012, that deadline for a newly-qualifying party to submit its petition (3 months before the primary, which means a deadline of early February) is still too early, and therefore the court ordered the Secretary of State to leave the Libertarian Party on the ballot in 2012. That court decision did not discuss the status of the other minor parties that had been ballot-qualified in 2008 and 2010, the Constitution, Green, and Socialist Parties.

Given that the statutory deadline will be in December 2011, this increases the likelihood that the Ohio Secretary of State will agree to include the Constitution, Green, and Socialist Parties on the 2012 ballot, and probably Americans Elect as well, without more litigation.

Washington, D.C. Mayor Appoints a New Election Board Member who Doesn’t Meet D.C. Residency Requirement

On September 21, Washington, D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray appointed three new members of the District of Columbia Board of Elections. However, one of his nominees, Robert L. Mallett, does not meet the city’s duration of residency requirement. That law requires members of the Board to have lived in the District continuously for the previous three years. Mallett does not meet that requirement. See this story.

City councilmember Mary Cheh said Mallett “could always petition for an exception.” D.C. also requires candidates for District of Columbia presidential electors to have lived in the District for the preceding three years, a law that has made it difficult for some minor parties in the past to field a slate of presidential electors. D.C. also does not permit petitioners to work in the District if they are not residents.

D.C. officials seem to have a propensity for ignoring election laws that are inconvenient. In 2010, initial election results showed that no Republican nominee for districtwide partisan office had polled as many as 7,500 votes. The D.C. Board of Elections then re-interpreted the law on how a party remains ballot-qualified, which on its face appears to require a party to poll 7,500 votes every two years. The D.C. Board said that because John McCain had polled more than 7,500 votes for President in the District in November 2008, that was good enough to extend the party’s status for four years, not just two years, and that therefore the party was still ballot-qualified. When the final returns were compiled, however, it turned out that the Republicans had polled more than 7,500 votes for one office in 2010.

Rhode Island Republican Legislator, Expelled from Republican Caucus, Joins Libertarian Party

Rhode Island State House member Daniel P. Gordon, Jr., elected as a Republican to his first term in November 2010, was expelled by the Republican House caucus earlier this month after he was arrested for not having appeared some time earlier in a Massachusetts court. See this story about his legal troubles. On September 21, he became a dues-paying member of the Libertarian Party. It is not clear if he has changed his voter registration from “Republican” to “Libertarian.” If he does so, the state will consider him a registered independent, because the Libertarian Party has never been a qualified party in Rhode Island. However, the voter registration form includes a blank line for “political party” so he is free to write in “Libertarian” on the card.

Gordon supported Ron Paul for the Republican presidential nomination in 2008, and says he has long been a libertarian by philosophy. His election to the Rhode House in November 2010 was extremely close; the vote was 2,707 for Gordon and 2,660 for his Democratic opponent. He represents the 71st district, centered on Portsmouth. Thanks to Eric Dondero and Austin Cassidy for this news.

Green Party Nominee in Massachusetts Special Legislative Race has Biggest Campaign War Chest So Far

On October 18, Massachusetts holds a special election to fill the empty State House seat, in the Berkshire 3rd district. So far, Green Party nominee Mark Miller has more funds in his campaign bank account than any of his three opponents. He is opposed by a Democrat, a Republican, and an independent. See this story. Miller ran for this seat as a Green last year, and polled 45% of the vote in a two-person race against a Democrat.

California Secretary of State Files Brief in Petitioner Residency Lawsuit

On September 21, California filed this brief with the 9th circuit, in Libertarian Party of Los Angeles County v Bowen, 11-55316. The issue is the state law that says circulators for candidate petitions (for district office, such as U.S. House or state legislature) must live in the relevant district. The state concedes that the residency requirement for circulators is unconstitutional. But it says the lawsuit should be dismissed because the Secretary of State doesn’t enforce it. The petition form requires circulators to sign a statement at the bottom of the form “under penalty of perjury” that they do live in the district.

To establish that the Secretary of State doesn’t enforce the residency requirement for circulators, the state also asks the Court to take judicial notice of a 1980 ruling from a past Secretary of State, which says that signatures on a petition should count, even if the circulator isn’t a registered voter. But the 1980 ruling also says, “A circulator who completes a false affidavit is subject to criminal prosecution for perjury or, where applicable, violating Elections Code 29780, and suspected violators should be reported by local elections officials to the proper authorities.” Here is the state’s request that the court take judicial notice of the 1980 ruling, which includes a link to that 1980 ruling. It also includes a link to a January 2010 statement by the current Secretary of State that she still adheres to the 1980 ruling.