Four Years Ago at this Time, Rock the Debates was Doing Good Work for Inclusive General Election Presidential Debates

Four years ago, Rock the Debates was seeking out opportunities to question leading presidential candidates on whether they would agree to at least one general election presidential debate (if that candidate became the Democratic or Republican presidential nominee). Especially active were Larry Reinsch of Iowa, and Seth Cohn of New Hampshire. They attended public meetings at which Democratic and Republican presidential candidates were speaking and answering questions. If they were able to ask a question of the candidate, they would ask about that candidate’s attitude toward inclusive general election debates.

By October 2007, ten Democratic and Republican presidential contenders had been asked the question. Generally the exchange was videotaped. Hillary Clinton gave one of the best responses. Unfortunately, Rock the Debates has become inactive, but perhaps the organization, or a similar organization, will be revived.

Rock the Debates always asked the candidates if they would accept the idea of at least one general election debate in which every presidential candidate who was on the ballot in enough states to theoretically win, would be invited. In the entire history of United States presidential elections, there have never been more than seven such candidates. In 2004 and 2008, there were six such candidates. We know from the experience of presidential primary debates that a 6-candidate debate is not unwieldy.

Nebraska Libertarians Begin Lobbying for a Better Ballot Access Law

On August 31, officials of the Nebraska Libertarian Party sent letters to certain state legislators, and state election officials, suggesting that the election law be modified to make it easier for ballot-qualified parties to remain on the ballot. Specifically, the letter asks for a change in the law to provide that when a party meets the vote test to remain on the ballot, that the effect lasts four years instead of just two years.

Nebraska requires a party to poll 5% of the vote for any statewide office, every election. It is fairly easy for a minor party to poll 5% of the vote in a midterm year, when Nebraska elects five statewide state offices. But it is rare for a minor party to be able to survive in a presidential election year, when the only statewide offices up are President, and, two-thirds of the time, U.S. Senate. As a result, parties must do another petition, and elections officials must check another petition. Both parties and elections officials are put to extra expense by this policy. Thanks to Randy Eshelman for this news.

U.S. District Court Will Hold Trial in Case Over Whether South Carolina Republican Party May Bar Non-Republicans from its Primaries

U.S. District Court Judge J. Michelle Childs will hold a trial in Greenville County Republican Party v State of South Carolina, 6:10-cv-1407. The trial is set for August 1, 2012, almost a year away. In the meantime, both sides will identify expert witnesses and conduct discovery. Because this case will take so long to reach a decision, the status quo will prevail for the 2012 presidential primary. All voters will be able to vote in the 2012 Republican presidential primary, even though the party, not the taxpayers, is paying for administration of the primary.

Arizona Supreme Court Accepts Case on Validity of Recall Petition

On August 31, the Arizona Supreme Court agreed to hear the case over the validity of petitions to recall State Senate President Russell Pearce. See this story. The lower court had agreed that the petition is valid. If the State Supreme Court agrees with the lower court, Arizona will then hold its first recall for a state legislator. Senator Pearce does not contest the point that the recall petition was signed by a sufficient number of registered voters, but his lawsuit focuses on technical deficiencies concerning the petition.

The Arizona Supreme Court still hasn’t decided whether to hear another election law case, the one over whether the state has the authority to tell Tucson that the city must use non-partisan elections. In the State Supreme Court, that case is State of Arizona v City of Tucson, cv11-0150-pr.

Mayor Bloomberg Will Testify in Criminal Trial Involving Funds Channelled Through Independence Party

The New York Post reports that Mayor Michael Bloomberg will be a witness in the trial that opens September 12, in the matter of the money that Bloomberg contributed to the Independence Party and which the Independence Party then passed on to John Haggerty. Haggerty was to use the money to help the Bloomberg re-election campaign in 2009, but according to the indictment, he did not use the money on the campaign, but diverted it to his own use. Thanks to the Independent View for the link.