Colorado Bill Moving Primary Passes; Amendments Make Petition Deadlines Far Worse for New Parties and Independent Candidates

On May 3, the Colorado House passed SB 189, and on May 5, the Senate concurred in the House amendments, so the bill is now through the legislature. The bill moves the non-presidential primary from the 2nd Tuesday in August, to the last Tuesday in June. Unfortunately, the bill was amended to make all petition deadlines for new parties and independent candidates earlier than they had been.

The new deadline for an independent presidential candidate (or the presidential nominee of an unqualified party) moves from 140 days before the general election, to 155 days before the general election. Assuming the bill is signed, the 2012 deadline will be June 4. Colorado already had the nation’s second-earliest deadline for independent presidential candidates (only Texas is earlier) and the new deadline would probably be unconstitutional if challenged in court. Other states in which later independent candidate deadlines have been held unconstitutional are Alaska, Arizona, Kansas, Nevada, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and South Dakota. Ironically, the current Secretary of State of Colorado, Scott Gessler, was in private practice as an attorney before he was elected Secretary of State, and in 2004 he won a lawsuit on behalf of Socialist Party presidential candidate Walt Brown over the former Secretary of State’s refusal to accept Brown’s paperwork on July 4. Brown had slid the paperwork under the Secretary of State’s locked door on that date, which was the deadline, but the former Secretary of State had refused to accept it. Gessler won a state court order that Brown should be put on the ballot.

The bill also moves the petition deadline for a new party to the second Friday in January. Generally, newly-qualifying parties do not nominate by convention, although if two candidates for the same office received a significant vote at the newly-qualifying party’s convention, state law does provide for a primary for that party for just that one office. Such primaries are extremely rare in Colorado. The bill also moves the petition deadline for non-presidential independents to 155 days before the general election, and says that the nominating conventions of ballot-qualified minor parties must be no later than 73 days before the primary.

Michael Chamness Files Motion for Summary Judgment in Lawsuit against Top-Two Details

On May 6, Michael Chamness filed his motion for summary judgment in Chamness v Bowen, the federal case against two particular details of the California top-two system. The case attacks California’s discriminatory policy on ballot labels. It also attacks the new California law that says even though write-in space is to be printed on the ballot in Congressional and state office November elections, and even though the ballot doesn’t warn voters that any write-ins won’t be counted, in fact write-ins cannot be counted.

No declaratory judgment on either of these complaints has yet been issued by any California court, state or federal. The only action so far has been a denial of injunctive relief in various California special elections that have been held this year. Proponents of the top-two system, including almost all of California’s large daily newspapers, have generally not reported on these particular details about the top-two law, and have given little publicity to this lawsuit.

Green Party Member Elected to Oklahoma City Council Last Month

Dr. Edward Shadid, 43, a spinal surgeon, was elected to the city council of Oklahoma City on April 5, 2011. The election was non-partisan. He had run for the legislature as a Green Party nominee in 2010, and had polled 10.5% in a race against a Democrat and a Republican. Because the Green Party has never been on the ballot, he was on the 2010 ballot as an independent.

Here is a news story about his winning a seat on the city council last month. Several hundred thousand dollars in independent expenditures were spent against him, but he still won the April run-off with 62% of the vote. UPDATE: he is a registered Independent, according to the Oklahoma County Election Board. the newspaper story is incorrect when it says he is a Democrat. Neither he, nor anyone else in Oklahoma, is permitted to be registered “Green”.

Ruth Ellen Brosseau Becomes One of Canadian Parliament's Best-Known New Members

Ruth Ellen Brosseau is a newly elected member of the Canadian parliament. Here is just one of many articles about her. She was a New Democratic Party nominee from a Quebec district, and she won, even though she never believed that she would win. She is 27 years old and has apparently never visited the district that elected her. However, she seems a capable and dedicated individual, and most of the comments attached to this particular article are supportive. Canadian voters tend to be much more likely to vote on the basis of party than U.S. voters. The New Democratic Party also elected enough members of the Ontario Parliament in 1990 to take control of the Ontario government. That 1990 election also featured many New Democratic Party members of the provincial parliament who had not expected to win.

Canada requires 100 signatures plus a filing fee for a candidate any candidate to get on the ballot for the federal parliament. Thanks to Thomas Jones for the link.

New Jersey Supreme Court Won't Hear Carl Lewis Appeal on Residency

On May 6, the New Jersey Supreme Court refused to hear Layton v Lewis, the case involving whether former Olympic track star Carl Lewis really was a resident of New Jersey during the preceding four years. Lewis is trying to run for the Democratic nomination for State Senate in the June 7, 2011 primary. See this story.

Now, Lewis’ only hope is that the U.S. District Court rules that the New Jersey Constitution violates the U.S. Constitution. The New Jersey Constitution does not let people run for State Senate unless they have lived in New Jersey for the preceding four years. The U.S. District Court already turned Lewis down, but then the 3rd circuit had ordered the U.S. District Court to reconsider the case. The 3rd circuit order told election officials not to print any ballots that omit Lewis, so the next precedings in the U.S. District Court will be quick.