Lawsuit Filed to Block Arizona 2012 Vote on Shutting off Funding for Public Funding

On May 6, some potential future candidates filed a lawsuit in Arizona state court, seeking to block a scheduled 2012 vote of the people on whether to shut off financing for public funding of candidates. See this story. The lawsuit includes some plaintiffs who want to seek public funding in Tucson city elections in the future. Apparently the proposed constitutional amendment that will be before the voters not only affects the state program for public funding for candidates for state office, but does the same to Tucson’s program for candidates in city elections.

The case is Arizona Advocacy Network Foundation v Bennett, Maricopa County Superior Court, cv2011-009646.

Republican Party National Leaders Express Unhappiness with First Republican Presidential Debate

On the evening of May 5, the Republican Party of South Carolina and Fox News hosted the first presidential debate of the 2012 season, for candidates seeking the Republican nomination. Participating were Ron Paul, Gary Johnson, Tim Pawlenty, Rick Santorum, and Herman Cain. According to this New York Times story, the chair of the Republican National Committee, Reince Priebus, said, “There are numerous other candidates that are looking at it – and thank God.” Also, John Boehner, speaker of the U.S. House, pointedly did not even watch the debate, at least while it was occurring.

Someone ought to ask Reince Priebus why Republican legislators this year in Oklahoma and Florida are making ballot access for non-major party candidates for President considerably more difficult, and why no Republican Party presidential nominee since 1992 has been willing to let any non-major party presidential candidate into the general election debates. If the orthodox Republican leadership supports policies that it make overwhelmingly difficult for people to run for president outside the major parties, they should not be surprised when candidates seek the Republican nomination even though those candidates espouse political ideas that do not conform to the Republican Party platform or the ideas of the party’s congressional leadership. Thanks to Political Wire for the link.

British Voters Reject Instant Runoff Voting, 32% to 68%

British voters rejected the ballot question to use Instant Runoff Voting, 32% to 68%. Turnout was approximately 44%. This was the first British ballot question, covering the entire nation, since 1975. See this story. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link. The measure initially was leading in the polls, but then the Conservative Party launched an all-out campaign against it.

Americans Elect Submits its Petition for Ballot Status in Arizona

On April 13, Americans Elect turned in its petition for party status in Arizona. The counties are checking the signatures now, and expect to be finished by May 13. Assuming the petition is valid, Americans Elect will then be ballot-qualified for 2012 in three states. The other two are Nevada and Florida.

Americans Elect wants to choose a presidential nominee in the summer of 2012, in which all U.S. voters would be eligible to participate. The group hopes to nominate a presidential candidate via internet voting. Americans Elect does not desire to have candidates for any office other than President and Vice-President (and presidential electors, of course).

Seventh Circuit Sends Case on Chicago Ballot Access Back to U.S. District Court

On May 4, the 7th circuit issued this 3-page opinion in Stone v Neal, 11-1085. This case challenges the requirement that all candidates for non-partisan citywide office in Chicago need 12,500 valid signatures to get on the ballot.

The Court said there is nothing for it to do in this case at this time, because the election is over, and therefore the appeal of the District Court’s order, denying injunctive relief, is moot. The case now returns to the U.S. District Court for a decision on the constitutionality of the requirement. The tone of the 7th circuit’s order is ever so slightly favorable to the candidates who brought the lawsuit. The first paragraph highlights that Chicago’s ballot access requirements seem sharply at variance with the ballot access laws of other large U.S. cities.