On July 19, the Green Party of Tennessee, and the Constitution Party of Tennessee, jointly filed a new lawsuit in federal court, alleging that the new ballot access law passed this year is just as unconstitutional as the old one. As reported previously, in September 2010 the old law was held unconstitutional. In response, the 2011 session of the legislature deleted the language on the petition saying the signers are members, and moved the petition deadline from March to April. The case is Green Party of Tennessee et al v Hargett, middle district, 3:11-cv-00692. Here is the complaint.
Ballot Access News erred when it reported that the new Florida ballot access law for minor party presidential candidates requires a petition signed by 4% of the last presidential vote, unless the minor party is recognized by the Federal Election Commission. The bill was amended on the day before it passed the legislature, so that parties not recognized by the FEC as national committees need a petition of 1% of the number of registered voters. The 4% provision was deleted by that last-minute amendment. BAN regrets the error. Thanks to Dan Winslow for this news.
Although the law is not as bad as had been reported, it still seems obviously unconstitutional. The Florida Constitution says, “The requirements for … a candidate of a minor party for placement of the candidate’s name on the ballot shall be no greater than the requirements for a candidate of the party having the largest number of registered voters.” The new law requires new parties (new parties can never be recognized by the FEC) in 2012 to submit 112,174 valid signatures, whereas the Democratic Party (the Florida party with the most registered voters) need not do anything to place its presidential nominee on the ballot except certify a list of presidential elector candidates, and the names of the Presidential and Vice-Presidential candidates they are pledged to, to the Secretary of State.
Furthermore, the petition is due July 15, months before the two major parties will be formally choosing their presidential tickets. The 2012 Democratic national convention is in September 2012.
On July 20, the American Civil Liberties Union of New Mexico sued New Mexico Secretary of State Diana Duran in state court. The issue is that the Secretary of State has told the press that she has found evidence that thousands of non-citizens have voted in recent New Mexico elections, but that she refuses to release this evidence. The lawsuit is based on state laws on public access to state government information. The case is ACLU of New Mexico v Duran, state district court, 2nd district, cv 2011-07257. Here is the complaint.
The Arkansas Green Party has decided to collect signatures to get back on the ballot for 2012. The law requires the petition to be completed in 3 months. The party will seek its 10,000 valid signatures between September 3 and December 1, 2011. Meanwhile, the party is still waiting for the 8th circuit to issue an opinion in its lawsuit over the vote test for remaining on the ballot. It is conceivable that the petition won’t be needed.
Irregular Times has made available the Americans Elect Bylaws, which can be read here. The Bylaws are interesting for several reasons. The founders of Americans Elect have made provision for the possibility that the Americans Elect presidential nominee will receive some electoral votes, and furthermore that no presidential candidate may end up with a majority of the electoral votes. The Bylaws are careful to say that the presidential electors of American Elect will be formally unpledged, leaving them free to bargain over whom to give their electoral votes to, in case there are some Americans Elect electors and in case no presidential candidate receives a majority of the electoral vote.
The Bylaws are also interesting because they seem to place the power to nominate candidates in the hands of the Candidate Certification Committee. The bylaws say, “All qualified persons, regardless of their membership in any political party, shall be eligible to seek or accept the nomination of Americans Elect.” But they also say, “The Candidate Certification Committee shall be responsible for certifying that candidates and draftees be eligible (referring to Constitutional qualifications to hold the office), as well as to develop criteria of demonstrated achievements based on qualifications of past Presidents and Vice-Presidents to ensure that only persons capable of performing the duties of President and Vice-President are eligible for voting by the registered delegates.”
This seems to suggest that no one may seek the nomination of Americans Elect for President or Vice-President unless that person has either previously won elective office to a high position, or been a cabinet member, or been a very important general. No one has ever been elected President who did not meet one of those conditions. The bylaws say the decision of the Candidate Certification Committee can be overridden with a two-thirds vote of all delegates, but it would be virtually impossible for two-thirds of all the delegates to do anything together. There will be a large number of delegates who will probably remain passive and will not participate. Anyone U.S. adult citizen may sign up to be a delegate. Access to the contact list for the delegates will, of course, be a key asset.