On March 2, the Arizona Senate Government Reform Committee passed HB 2335. The bill says that vice-presidential nominees should have their names on the November ballot. Currently, Arizona and North Dakota are the only states that don’t print the names of vice-presidential nominees on the ballot.

HB 2335 started out as a bill to delete the names of candidates for presidential elector from the November ballot. Arizona has eleven electoral votes starting in 2012, and if there are six slates on the ballot, for example, that involves printing the names of 66 candidates for presidential elector on the ballot. That takes up a lot of room, and most people would probably think the voters don’t care who the presidential elector candidates are. But, after the bill was introduced, it was amended to leave the presidential elector candidates’ names on the ballot.

Back on January 7, 2011, the Kentucky Senate passed an interesting bill to move the presidential primary from May to August. It is SB 4. However, it cannot pass, because the House Elections Committee never set it for a hearing, and that Committee doesn’t expect to meet again this year.

Colorado campaign finance laws permit an individual to donate $400 to a candidate for the legislature who is nominated by primary. Almost always, only Democrats and Republicans are nominated by primary in Colorado. The statute also says no one can give more than $200 to a legislative candidate who is nominated by convention, or by petition. Generally, independent candidates are nominated by petition; minor party candidates are nominated either by convention or by petition.

Last year, independent write-in candidate Kathleen Curry filed a federal lawsuit, arguing that the U.S. Constitution does not permit a state to discriminate against her, and other non-major party candidates, by limiting contributions to her to only half as much money as the limit on Democratic and Republican candidates. She filed the case in U.S. District Court. However, on September 16, the U.S. District Court Judge ruled that perhaps the Colorado statute violates the Colorado Constitution. He asked the Colorado Supreme Court to answer that question. On February 4, 2011, the Colorado Supreme Court agreed to do so.

The Colorado Constitution, Article 28, section 3, says, “No person…shall make to a candidate committee…aggregate contributions for a primary or a general election in excess of…$200 to any one state senate or state house of representatives…candidate committee.” The statute, however, says someone can contribute $400 to a legislative candidate who went through the primary process. The donor can give $200 during the primary season and another $200 in the general election season. But it also lets a donor give $400 during the primary season, although that donor can then no longer give anything to that candidate in the general election season. And the statute lets a donor give $400 during the general election season to a candidate, if that donor had not contributed to that candidate during the primary season.

If the Colorado Supreme Court rules that the statute is not consistent with the State Constitution, then the federal court won’t need to make a decision about whether the statute violates the U.S. Constitution. The name of the case in both courts is Riddle v Ritter. The first-named plaintiff, Joelle Riddle, is someone who wanted to contribute $400 to the candidate-plaintiff, Kathleen Curry. All the briefs in the Colorado Supreme Court are due by late April 2011.