Alaska Ballot Access Bill Introduced

On January 18, Alaska Representative Max Gruenberg (D-Anchorage) introduced HB 96. It eases the definition of “political party” to a group that has at least 2,500 registered members. Currently, the number of registered voters a group needs to be a qualified party is 3% of the vote cast in the last election. That number varies according to whether the last election was a high-turnout presidential election, or a lower-turnout midterm election, and ranges from 7,000 to 10,000.

Delaware House Passes Bill, Forbidding Parties from Nominating a Non-Member

On January 25, the Delaware House passed HB 11, which makes it illegal for any party to nominate someone who is not a registered member of that party (although the bill exempts Presidential and Vice-Presidential candidates). The motivation for the bill is to make it impossible for two parties to jointly nominate the same person, but the bill goes further than that. See this story.

Pennsylvania Ballot Access Bill Introduced

On January 12, Pennsylvania State Senator Mike Folmer (R-Lebanon) again introduced the Voter Choice Act that he had introduced in 2009. This year it is Senate Bill 21. It changes the definition of “political party” to a group that has registration of at least one-twentieth of 1% of the number of registered voters. If this bill were in effect, the Constitution, Green and Libertarian Parties would be recognized as parties, along with the Democratic and Republican Parties. Currently, only the Democratic, Republican and Libertarian Parties are recognized as parties. The existing law says a “party” is a group that polled 2% of the winner’s vote for either of the last two statewide elections (the Libertarians met the vote test in 2009).

The bill also says that qualified parties with less than 15% of the voter registration may nominate by convention, and inform election officials of their nominees no later than 8 weeks before the general election. They would not need any petitions. Currently, parties with less than 15% of the voter registration must submit petitions for all of their nominees (except they need no petition for special elections), and these petition requirements, for statewide office, can range all the way from 20,000 signatures to 67,000 valid signatures, because the formula for determining the number of signatures is erratic.

The bill also helps independent candidates, by cutting the number of signatures they need down to the same number of signatures that candidates running in a party primary need. Currently, statewide candidates in a primary need 2,000 signatures.

Homeless Candidate Removed from Chicago Ballot Because Post Office Where He Has Post Office Box is Not in the Ward He Sleeps In

On January 25, Sylvester “Junebug” Hendricks filed a lawsuit in Illinois Circuit Court in Cook County, seeking to be placed back on the ballot as a candidate for Alderman, 5th district of Chicago. He had been removed from the ballot on December 23, 2010, on the grounds that the post office where he has his post office box is not in the 5th district; instead it is in the 9th district. See this story.

Illinois election law section 10 ILCS 5/3-2(b) says “A homeless individual must have a mailing address in order to be eligible to register to vote. For purposes of this Act, a mailing address shall constitute a homeless individual’s residence for voting purposes.”

Hendricks argues that he does regularly sleep at a particular address that is in the 5th district. He also points out that no one lives in a post office box. See here for the Board of Election Commissioner’s findings that he may not run in the 5th district.

Two Wyoming Bills to Alter Who can Vote in Partisan Primaries are Defeated

On January 25, two Wyoming bills to change the law on who can vote in partisan primaries were defeated in the Senate Corporations, Elections and Political Subdivisions Committee. Currently, Wyoming voter registration forms ask the voter to choose a party (or independent status), and neither bill proposed to change that.

SF 96 would have provided that, on primary day, any voter is free to choose any party’s primary ballot, without having to switch his or her party registration. This bill lost 3-2 in the Committee. The two “yes” votes were from one Democrat and one Republican. The three “no” votes were from two Republicans and one Democrat. If this bill had passed, the change would not have been profound, because existing law lets any voter switch parties on primary election day. Wyoming also lets voters register for the first time on primary election day.

SF 13 would have provided that no voter may switch parties in the 60 days before a primary. That bill lost 5-0.