On December 10, two important campaign finance cert petitions were filed with the U.S. Supreme Court. Louisiana Republican Congressman Joseph Cao, along with the Republican National Committee, asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear Cao v Federal Election Commission. And the Connecticut Green Party asked that Court to hear Green Party of Connecticut v Lenge, the case against Connecticut’s discriminatory law on public funding of candidates for state office.
See here for the Cao cert petition, which challenges part of the McCain-Feingold law which does not permit a political party to spend more than $5,000 to help the campaign of one its nominees, unless the party spending is completely uncoordinated with the nominee. Cao and the Republican Party argue that the limit is unconstitutional, as to campaign speech in which the party is speaking its own message. Cao argues there is a difference between party spending that advocates the party’s message (but which is coordinated with the nominee), versus a party simply paying campaign bills for its nominee. The full 5th circuit had rejected Cao’s argument by a vote of 11-5.
Here is the Green Party cert petition. The Appendix is very long, but the text of the petition itself only occupies the first 34 pages.