Mexican American Political Association Endorses Four Statewide Peace & Freedom Party Nominees

The Mexican American Political Association is a 50-year old California political organization.  It is non-partisan but it endorses candidates in California elections.  This year it has endorsed the Peace & Freedom Party nominees for four of the eight statewide partisan races.  It has endorsed Marylou Cabral for Secretary of State, Karen Martinez for Controller, Debra Reiger for Treasurer, and Dina Padilla for Insurance Commissioner.  For the other four statewide partisan races, MAPA endorsed the Democratic nominees.

MAPA’s web page is www.mapa-ca.org.  The preamble to the list of endorsements says, “The gap between wealth and poverty has not been as extreme since the 1890s, and it is only getting worse.  The political challenge presented to all Latino and non-Latino organizations, typically tied to the Democratic Party, is the sad reality that the political party in power with majorities at the state and national level not observed since the 1970s has continued to pursue economic and social policies not in accord with its own core constituencies.  Having said that, we are not confident that the Democratic Party in California or nationally will do anything beyond managing the crisis for big capital at the continued expense of working people.”

Colorado Will Count Write-ins When Voter Forgot to Fill in the Oval, if those Votes are Material to the Outcome

As a result of Kathleen Curry’s lawsuit in state court, Colorado election officials will recognize the validity of write-in votes in which the voter forgets to fill in the oval next to the write-in line, if that vote is material for knowing who was elected.  Curry is a write-in candidate, and she is also an incumbent running for re-election.  She is a write-in candidate because she changed her registration from “Democrat” to “independent” in December 2009, too late to be eligible to qualify as an independent candidate this year.

Ohio News Organization Explains Its Criteria for Admission to Debates

The Ohio News Organization sponsored candidate debates this year for the gubernatorial and U.S. Senate races.  Only the Democratic and Republican nominees were invited to these debates.  Last month, Dan La Botz, Socialist Party nominee for U.S. Senate, complained to the Federal Election Commission that the Ohio News Organization did not list any objective criteria for its debates, and furthermore that no polls in Ohio had included everyone who is on the ballot for that office.  The U.S. Senate race has five candidates on the ballot.

On October 21, the Ohio News Organization responded to the La Botz complaint.  The Ohio News Organization says that its objective criteria is that it wants the two front-runners to be the only participants in its debates.  That is not what is usually meant by “objective criteria.”  Generally, “objective criteria” means some particular showing in the polls.  Even the Commission on Presidential Debates has a 15% poll showing, to determine who gets invited.  It will be interesting to see the FEC’s reaction to the Ohio News Organization’s defense.

Another Federal Lawsuit Over What Clothes Can be Worn at Polls

On October 26, Vincent McMahan, chair of World Wrestling Entertainment, filed a federal lawsuit against Connecticut’s Secretary of State.  The Secretary of State’s office had seemed to announce that voters would not be permitted to be within 75 feet of a polling place if they were wearing clothing that refers to World Wrestling Entertainment.  The Republican nominee for U.S. Senate in Connecticut, Linda McMahon, is married to Vincent McMahan, and she is well-known for having built that business.

Also on October 26, the Secretary of State issued a press release denying that she had promulgated any such blanket rule, but seeming to acknowledge that instances would be decided on a “case-by-case basis”, which is even worse, because it is arbitrary.  Thanks to Rick Hasen’s ElectionLawBlog for this news.

A similar lawsuit in Arizona was recently won by a voter who had warn a T-shirt mentioning the Tea Party.

Herb Lux Files Brief in 4th Circuit in Virginia Petitioner Residency Case

On October 26, Herb Lux filed this brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals, 4th circuit, in his ballot access case, Lux v Rodrigues, 10-1997.  This is the case that challenges the Virginia law that makes it illegal for anyone to circulate a petition for U.S. House, outside of the circulator’s home district.  The brief is 40 pages and is very strong.