California Bill for Instant Runoff Voting in Special Partisan Elections Has Hearing

On Tuesday, April 20, at 1:30 p.m., the California Senate Elections Committee will hear SB 1346, which allows the use of Instant Runoff Voting in special partisan elections for U.S. House and state legislature. The hearing is in room 3191 in the State Capitol.

An identical bill in the Assembly, AB 2732, was going to be heard at virtually the same hour in the Assembly Elections Committee, but the Assembly Committee hearing on that bill has been canceled so that all witnesses can appear at the Senate hearing. The Secretary of State supports the bill. The bill, if enacted, would only apply if all the counties involved in any particular special election are willing to use IRV. Use of IRV would convert these special elections into one-round elections. Currently, most special elections in California require two rounds, using blanket primary rules. The second round only occurs if no one gets 50% in the first round, and includes the top vote-getter from each party. Generally, when there is no incumbent (and special elections never have incumbents), no one gets 50% in the first round.

Atlanta Progressive News Covers Mary Norwood Independent Run in Georgia

The Atlanta Progressive News has this story about obstacles that Mary Norwood faces, as she tried to collect 27,000 valid signatures between now and July 13. She is an independent candidate for Chair of the Fulton County, Georgia, Commission. UPDATE: the number of signatures she needs is 22,599. Georgia calculates the number of signatures for district and county office by taking 5% of the number of registered voters at the general election in which that office was last up. The office was last up in 2006, not 2008. There were many fewer registered voters in 2006 than 2008.

She was previously on the City Council (the city has non-partisan elections) and she came very close to being elected Mayor of Atlanta last year.

National Republican Party Leaders Try to Persuade Governor Crist Not to Run for U.S. Senate

National leaders of the Republican Party are working to try to persuade Republican Florida Governor Charlie Crist not to run for U.S. Senate this year, according to this New York Times story of April 19.

National Republican Party officials don’t want him to run as an independent, nor do they seem to want him to run in this year’s Republican primary. They suggest that he should run the other U.S. Senate seat when it is up in 2012.

Massachusetts Libertarian Party Will Lose its Qualified Status This Year by Not Running Any Statewide Candidates

The Massachusetts Libertarian Party is ballot-qualified, and it could keep its status through 2012 by running a candidate for any statewide office this year. Although the law requires that one of the party’s statewide nominees poll 3%, it is a virtual certainty that the Libertarian Party could easily meet this test for an office like State Treasurer. Generally, Republicans don’t run anyone for State Treasurer. In 2006, when only the Democratic and Green Parties had a candidate for Treasurer, the Green Party polled 16.45% for that office. The Green Party also polled 17.75% for Secretary of State, another office that Republicans didn’t run for.

However, the Massachusetts Libertarian Party is not running anyone for any statewide office this year. As a result, the party will lose its place on the voter registration form. It will lose its 2012 presidential primary. And it will be required to circulate a difficult petition for the party’s presidential nominee.

The Massachusetts Libertarian Party says it can’t find anyone who wants to run for statewide office this year. It is true that if any candidate emerged, he or she would need 5,000 signatures to get on the Libertarian Party’s primary ballot, and only registered Libertarians and registered independents could sign. This is a tough requirement, but over half of all Massachusetts registered voters are registered independents, so it isn’t as bad as it might seem at first.

It is possible a lawsuit could be won against the state’s difficult petition requirements for getting candidates on the primary ballot of a small party, but if the Massachusetts Libertarian Party loses its qualified status, it won’t have standing to pursue such a lawsuit. Currently, the only qualified parties in Massachusetts are the Democratic, Republican, and Libertarian Parties, so no other party has standing to bring such a lawsuit.

Federal Government Does Not Ask for Rehearing in Unity08 Decision

As noted much earlier, on March 2, the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C., struck down a Federal Election Commission ruling that limited the amount of money an individual may donate to a new political party to $5,000. That decision was Unity08 v FEC, 08-5526.

The federal government has not asked for a rehearing en banc in the Unity08 decision, and the deadline for doing that has now passed.

It is still theoretically possible that the government could ask the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse the decision. The deadline for that would be May 31.