Virginia House Committee Approves Bill to Prevent Any Group from Seeing List of Which Voters Voted

The Virginia House Privileges and Elections Committee has passed SB 624, which now says no one (except election administrators) may have access to the list of which voters voted in the last primary or the last election. The bill is on second reading in the House.

This bill started out in the Senate doing almost the exact opposite. The original bill expanded the list of groups that may see this list, to include groups that encourage voter participation. The existing law says that parties, candidates, and political committees may see the list. A group that wanted to use the list to encourage voter participation had sued the state, saying if parties, candidates, and political committees may see the list, there is no state interest in preventing it from seeing the list also. The somewhat ironic conclusion is that now no groups will be able to see the list, if the bill as currently amended becomes law.

Amici Briefs in U.S. Supreme Court in Freedom of Association Case Are Overwhelmingly On One Side

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear Christian Legal Society v Martinez, 08-1371, on April 19. This is not an election law case, but it is a freedom of association case, so it will likely impact the law on political parties. The issue is whether a public law school can require student groups to admit any student (at that school) as a member.

The amici briefs are all in now, and they are overwhelmingly against the law school. There are 22 amici briefs on the side of the Christian Legal Society, and none on the side of the school. There is also one brief in support of neither side. To see these briefs, use this American Bar Association web page link.

Nebraska Bill to End Letting Each U.S. House District Choose its Own Presidential Elector is Indefinitely Postponed

The Nebraska bill to end the practice of letting each U.S. House district choose its own presidential elector, LB 777, has been indefinitely postponed. That almost certainly means the author has given up on moving it ahead this year.

Nebraska and Maine are the only states that let each U.S. House district choose its own presidential elector.

California Legislative Hearing on Proposition 14 Can be Watched

Use this link to watch the March 2 hearing of the California Assembly Elections Committee, on whether Proposition 14 would increase costs for election administration. Thanks to James Hodges for the link. The hearing lasts about 90 minutes. County elections officials from Los Angeles, San Diego, Sacramento, and Contra Costa Counties testify on why Proposition 14, in their opinion, would increase costs. Afterwards there is public testimony, including from representatives of three minor parties, Green, Libertarian, and Peace & Freedom.

The sound doesn’t turn on until 9 minutes and 57 seconds, so just skip ahead. The legislature turns the sound on when the hearing is called into order.

This is the first legislative hearing ever held on California’s top-two open primary measure. No hearing was held when it was passed in February 2009. One may wonder why a hearing is held after the measure has already been passed, but it is traditional for the California legislature to hold hearings on statewide ballot measures. The voters will vote on the measure on June 8, 2010.

New Hampshire House Sets Floor Vote on Ballot Access Bill

On Wednesday, the New Hampshire House expects to take up HB 1188, which cuts the number of signatures required for independent candidates down to only two-thirds of the existing requirements. For example, the statewide requirement would drop from 3,000 to 2,000. The bill also lowers the petition to create a new ballot-qualified party from 3% of the last gubernatorial vote, to 1.5% of the number of registered voters, which is a modest improvement in midterm years, although not much of an improvement in presidential years.

Petitioning is more difficult in New Hampshire than in any other state. New Hampshire is the only state that limits a petition sheet to just one voter. Each sheet has many blanks that must be filled out, which increases the workload. Also it isn’t easy for a petitioner to keep possession of so many separate pieces of paper. Also, New Hampshire is one of only eight states that has a distribution requirement for statewide petitions. Partly because of these details, the Green Party has never been on the ballot for a statewide candidate in New Hampshire, except for President in 2000.

New Hampshire only required 1,000 signatures for statewide petitions, and had no distribution requirement, until the 1980’s.

The House will also be voting on HB 1264, which authorizes interim study on what the requirements should be for petitions to create a new ballot-qualified party. That is expected to pass easily. HB 1188 only passed the Election Law Committee on an 8-6 vote, so the House vote is somewhat difficult to predict.