Pro-Secession Party Formed for Vermont

A group in Vermont has formed the Vermont Independence Day Party, which believes that Vermont should secede from the United States. It plans to place nominees on the 2010 ballot for Governor, Lieutenant Governor, and 7 State Senate seats. See this AP story. Thanks to Carter Momberger for the link.

The group did not use the organization method to qualify itself for the 2010 ballot, and it is too late to do that. That method requires showing that the party has town committees in at least ten towns. But, the group is free to qualify the party by petition for each of its individual candidates. They may have their label, “Vermont Independence Party” on the ballot if they wish. The story erroneously says they will be labeled “independent”. The story is also wrong when it says this is the first pro-secession party in any state. The Alaskan Independence Party has been continuously on the ballot in Alaska starting in 1974, although it didn’t become a qualified party until 1983. The Alaskan Independence Party was formed to work for secession, although its activists no longer talk about that goal.

Berkeley Will Use Instant Runoff Voting in 2010 City Elections

On January 12, the city manager of Berkeley, California, sent a letter to the city manager of San Leandro, California, indicating that Berkeley will use Instant Runoff Voting for its own city elections this year. There will be no June primary. Instead, the only city election will be in November 2010. The letter was sent to San Leandro because San Leandro is pondering whether to also use IRV this year.

Berkeley and San Leandro are both charter cities, so they are free to decide this matter for their own elections. Cities in California that are not charter cities do not have that freedom. The voters of Berkeley voted in 2006 to use IRV whenever the vote-counting equipment was ready, and a few weeks ago the Secretary of State certified the vote-counting machines used in Alameda County for that purpose. Oakland, Berkeley and San Leandro are all in Alameda County.

Tennessee Legislature May Vote Today on Repealing 2008 Law that Requires Paper Trail for Vote-Counting Machines

In 2008, the Tennessee legislature passed a law, requiring that all vote-counting machines must have a paper trail, starting in 2010. Currently, 93 of the 95 counties use electronic vote-counting machines that do not provide a paper trail.

According to this story, the Tennessee Senate will vote on January 12 on a bill to repeal the 2008 requirement. The bill number is unknown, but it is apparently sponsored by State Senator Ron Ramsey. Because Senator Ramsey is also Senate Speaker, he is referred to in the article as Tennessee’s Lieutenant Governor. Tennessee doesn’t have an elected Lieutenant Governor, and its Constitution says that if the governor dies or resigns, the Senate Speaker becomes Governor. Senator Ramsey is a Republican from eastern Tennessee. UPDATE: the Senate did pass the bill on January 12. Now it goes to the House. See this updated story. FURTHER UPDATE: the bill is now through the legislature (the House had passed the bill late in 2009, and Tennessee has two-year legislative sessions).

Libertarian Candidate for Georgia Secretary of State Does His Own Research on Potential Problems with Vote-Counting Machines

Georgia is one of the states that uses electronic vote-counting machines that do not leave any paper trail. David Chastain, a leader of the Georgia Libertarian Party and a candidate for the party’s nomination for Secretary of State, recently did his own research into possible vote-counting problems with the machines. He investigated recent special elections with only one item on the ballot.

His press release, showing the results of his research, has already been picked up by The Weekly of Gwinnett County. See this story. It shows that in recent one-issue elections, up to 3% of the voters go to the trouble of showing up at the polls, and then apparently not casting a vote on that single item on the ballot.

Chastain has been interested in this subject ever since he noticed that a 2005 Cobb County special election, to impose a special local option sales tax (“SPLOST”) won by only 114 votes, and that 285 voters went to the polls (in which the tax increase was the only item on the ballot) and apparently cast a blank vote. When he mentioned this at a January 2009 meeting of the State Election Board, the Board seemed uninterested. Later Chastain learned that the Board had then done an investigation, but never communicated this to him, and further found no problem with the vote-counting system. So, Chastain did more research into other elections with only one item on the ballot, as the article recounts.