The hearing in U.S. District Court in the Arizona Green Party case took about 40 minutes. The state defended its law, barring out-of-state circulators from working on a petition to get a party on the ballot, by saying there is no enforcement mechanism to stop out-of-state circulators from working on such a petition. That is a rather half-hearted defense, especially because the petition form is a state form and it says that the circulator is an Arizona resident.
The state defended the February petition deadline by saying that the state doesn’t use random sampling to check petitions for new parties, so it needs extra time. Arizona does use a 5% random sampling procedure to check initiative petitions, and there seems no rational reason why Arizona can’t also use random sampling to review petitions for a new party. A decision is likely by the end of this week.