Working Families Party May Elect City Council, School Board Seats in Bridgeport, Connecticut

Bridgeport, Connecticut, like other towns in that state, is hold local partisan elections on November 3, 2009. In Bridgeport, and certain other Connecticut towns, no one political party is permitted to run a full slate of candidates. This guarantees that local legislative bodies will not be comprised entirely of members of the strongest party.

Because the second-biggest party is guaranteed to win some seats, generally the Bridgeport city council and School Board are composed of Democratic and Republican nominees. However, this year, observers feel that it is not clear whether the Working Families Party or the Republican Party will win the seats reserved for the second strongest party. And, in the School Board race, one Republican member, Sauda Efia Baraka, who was denied renomination by the Republican Party is running for re-election as the Working Families Party nominee. See this story.

Arizona State Court Judge Voids 2009 Law To Increase Number of County Supervisors in Pinal County

Arizona law has long required counties with a population of more than 200,000 to have 5 county supervisors. Arizona county supervisors are elected on a partisan basis. Smaller counties may have 3 county supervisors.

In 2009, the legislature passed a bill that pertains only to Pinal County, and tells Pinal County to have a 5-member board, and to elect two new members in 2010. Pinal County had under 200,000 people in the 2000 census, so it only has 3 county supervisors. Populations estimates are that Pinal County is far above that level now, but this won’t be known officially until the 2010 census is taken, so if the 2009 bill had not passed, Pinal County wouldn’t have gone from a 3-member Board to a 5-member Board until 2011.

On October 30, a Superior Court Judge in Phoenix declared that the 2009 law violates the state Constitution, which bans “local or special laws.” The case was heard in Phoenix because all the judges in Pinal County had recused themselves. The Arizona legislature has a Republican majority, and Pinal County has a Democratic majority on its county Board, so the motivation for the bill had been Republican hopes that adding two new members to the Board in 2010 would give a Republican majority. Pinal County occupies most of the territory between Phoenix and Tucson. See this story.

New Utah Registration Data Shows Decline for Major Parties, Increase for Others

Utah registration as of October 19, 2009, has been tallied by the Utah state elections office. It shows: independent and unqualified parties 51.51%, Republican 39.35%, Democratic 8.76%, Libertarian .22%, Constitution .16%.

A year ago, the percentages were: independent and unqualified parties 49.13%, Republican 41.60%, Democratic 8.93%, Libertarian .20%, Constitution .14%. Thanks to Frank Fluckiger for the new data.

Same-Day Voter Registration Bills Introduced in Both Houses of Congress

On October 28, bills were introduced in both houses of Congress to require the states to let voters register at the polls on election day. The bills would affect federal elections only. The Senate bill is S.1986, by Senator Russ Feingold (D-Wis.). It has 4 co-sponsors, all Democrats. The House bill is H.R. 3957, by Representative Keith Ellison (D-Minn.). It has 5 co-sponsors, all Democrats.

States that already provide for election-day registration are Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. Also, North Carolina permits it at early-voting centers, up until the day before the election.

Illinois Senate Unanimously Overrides Gubernatorial Veto of HB 723

On October 30, the Illinois Senate voted unanimously to override Governor Pat Quinn’s veto of HB 723. Thus, the bill becomes law. It makes it more difficult for ballot-qualified parties to nominate candidates, after the February primary (the nation’s earliest Congressional primary in history) is over. Existing law lets ballot-qualified parties nominate by party meeting, if the primary didn’t produce a nominee. The new law still permits this, but says such nominees need a petition.

Most observers feel the bill was motivated by the fact that the Green Party became a fully-qualified party in November 2006. Major party legislators in Illinois are not accustomed to having a qualified party on the ballot (other than the Democratic and Republican Parties), and they are certainly not accustomed to having minor party or independent candidates running against them. The only parties, other than the Democratic and Republican Parties, that have been fully ballot-qualified in the last 80 years have been the Green Party currently, and the Illinois Solidarity Party 1986-1990.

The petition for unqualified parties to run candidates for the legislature is 5% of the last vote cast, so generally, during the last 70 years, there have been very few minor party candidates on the general election ballot for legislature.

Candidates for Illinois primaries need petitions to get on the primary ballot, and those petitions are due November 2, 2009, for the 2010 elections.