U.S. Justice Department OK's New Arizona Law that Forces Tucson to Use Non-Partisan City Elections

Posted on by October 22, 2009
6

On October 13, the Voting Rights Section of the U.S. Justice Department granted approval to Arizona’s new law that requires all cities in the state to use non-partisan elections for their own officers. However, there is still no certainty that Tucson (the only city in Arizona that has been using partisan elections) will be required to switch to non-partisan elections. The city is in state court, arguing that the law violates the Arizona Constitution. The judge in that case has already signed an order, letting the city’s 2009 election be run under the old, original partisan election method.

The Justice Department’s action contrasts with its action in August 2009, of not permitting the city of Kinston, North Carolina, to switch from partisan city elections to non-partisan city elections. That decision has received much attention in the last week, because Rush Limbaugh and the Washington Times publicized it. Kinston city officials are free to ask the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., to override the Justice Department, but they have not done so.

U.S. Justice Department OK’s New Arizona Law that Forces Tucson to Use Non-Partisan City Elections

Posted on by October 22, 2009
6

On October 13, the Voting Rights Section of the U.S. Justice Department granted approval to Arizona’s new law that requires all cities in the state to use non-partisan elections for their own officers. However, there is still no certainty that Tucson (the only city in Arizona that has been using partisan elections) will be required to switch to non-partisan elections. The city is in state court, arguing that the law violates the Arizona Constitution. The judge in that case has already signed an order, letting the city’s 2009 election be run under the old, original partisan election method.

The Justice Department’s action contrasts with its action in August 2009, of not permitting the city of Kinston, North Carolina, to switch from partisan city elections to non-partisan city elections. That decision has received much attention in the last week, because Rush Limbaugh and the Washington Times publicized it. Kinston city officials are free to ask the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., to override the Justice Department, but they have not done so.

Federal Election Commission Publishes 2008 Election Returns Book

Posted on by October 21, 2009
12

The Federal Election Commission has just released its book, “Federal Elections 2008”, which has election returns for President and Congress. There is no publication that takes greater pains to capture write-in votes. Even Congressional Quarterly’s “America Votes” doesn’t include, for example, the Rhode Island November 2008 presidential write-ins. Rhode Island is one of the states that doesn’t have a write-in declaration of write-in candidacy form, so the state tallies all write-ins. The book reveals that in Rhode Island, Hillary Clinton received 655 write-ins, and Ron Paul received 472 write-ins.

Copies of the book are free and are available from the FEC, phone 800-424-9530.

U.S. District Court in New Jersey Finds Lack of Standing for Plaintiffs Challenging Presidential Qualifications

Posted on by October 21, 2009
21

On October 20, U.S. District Court Judge Jerome Simandle, a Bush Sr. appointee, ruled that plaintiffs in Kerchner v Obama do not have standing to pursue their claim that President Obama does not meet the constitutional qualifications to be President. The decision is eleven pages long and says that the two plaintiffs, who are retired military officers, have no more stake in the matter than any citizen of the U.S. “The injury, if any, suffered by Plaintiffs is one that would be shared by all the American people.” The case is !;09-cv-253-JBS, and had been filed on January 20, 2009.