North Carolina Libertarians Receive $39,691 From Income Tax Checkoff

On August 13, the North Carolina Libertarian Party received $39,691 from the State Board of Elections. UPDATE: Democrats received $429,736; Republicans $264,951. This money is from the North Carolina state income tax forms. Those forms permit taxpayers to send a small donation to the party of their choice. This is the first time the Libertarian Party has received such funds in North Carolina since 2003, when it received $701. North Carolina law says only parties with registration of 1% should be on the tax form. However, the official who printed the tax forms late last year ignored that law, and printed the Libertarian Party on the form anyway, even though its registration was only .07%. The registration was low because all the party’s registrants had been erased in late 2005 because the party did not requalify quickly for 2006; instead it requalified in 2008 and remains qualified.

New York City Councilmember Restored to Democratic Primary Ballot

On August 12, a New York Supreme Court Justice put New York city councilmember Alan Gerson back on the Democratic Party primary ballot. Gerson is running for re-election. The Board of Elections had removed him because of a cover sheet error (a cover sheet must accompany all petitions in New York state; no other state has such a thing). See this story. The man who challenged Gerson’s petition is appealing to the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division; that hearing is set for Tuesday, August 18.

Federal Court Upholds South Carolina's Method of Restricting Fusion

On August 12, U.S. District Court Judge Cameron McGowan Currie, a Clinton appointee, upheld South Carolina election laws that permit fusion, but which also say that if someone gets the nomination of one party first, and later tries to get the nomination of a second party and fails, then the first nomination is voided. South Carolina Green Party v South Carolina State Election Commission, 3:08-cv-02790.

The plaintiff-candidate, Eugene Platt, had been nominated first for a legislative seat in 2008 by the Green Party. Then he tried to win the Democratic primary for the same seat, but he lost, so the state wouldn’t let him appear on the November ballot as the Green Party nominee. The decision says the burden on the Green Party was not severe, since the state would have let it choose another nominee. Here is the decision.

Federal Court Upholds South Carolina’s Method of Restricting Fusion

On August 12, U.S. District Court Judge Cameron McGowan Currie, a Clinton appointee, upheld South Carolina election laws that permit fusion, but which also say that if someone gets the nomination of one party first, and later tries to get the nomination of a second party and fails, then the first nomination is voided. South Carolina Green Party v South Carolina State Election Commission, 3:08-cv-02790.

The plaintiff-candidate, Eugene Platt, had been nominated first for a legislative seat in 2008 by the Green Party. Then he tried to win the Democratic primary for the same seat, but he lost, so the state wouldn’t let him appear on the November ballot as the Green Party nominee. The decision says the burden on the Green Party was not severe, since the state would have let it choose another nominee. Here is the decision.