Nevada Policy Research Institute Publishes Paper on Election Integrity Authored by Walter Olson of the Cato Institute

On February 22, 2024, the Nevada Policy Research Institute published a paper titled “Efficient, Timely and Reliable, A Framework for Election Law in Nevada. It is written by Walter Olson, Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute.

I found its content on election administration interesting, even though the report is minorly marred by several typos.

Nevada has recently had a poor performance regarding timely reporting of election results, and Olson points out that there are tradeoffs and tensions between competing goals of an election system.

Among his recommendations are:

#1: Nevada should complete its transition from “county-led voter registration to a so-called top-down system with extensive statewide direction”…”with a single constantly updated statewide uniform database overseen by the secretary of state.”

#2: An accurate voter database should be a top priority, with investment in “multiple frequently refreshed high-quality data sources and proactively reaching out to households and addresses following evidence of moves and other relevant changes.”

#3: “Nevada should stay in the Electronic Registration and Information Center, and work to improve and refine its capabilities.”

#4: “To keep voters informed of the progress of their ballots, Nevada should finish the job of adopting strong ballot tracking and notification.”

#5: In addition to their signature, voters should have to write their driver’s license number or last four digits of their Social Security Number on their mail-in ballots.

#6: Nevada should invest in making ballot drop boxes more secure and in employee protocols for handling ballots, and

#7: End the practice of ballot harvesting.

Here is the Nevada Policy report on Nevada election administration.

Georgia Libertarian Ballot Access Case Concerning U.S. House Elections is Still Alive

The Georgia Libertarian Party lawsuit Cowen v Raffensperger, n.d., 1:17cv-4660, is still alive. It challenges the Georgia requirements for a candidate for U.S. House to get on the ballot. Except for the nominees of parties that polled 20% for president, the procedures are so severe, they have not been ever used by a minor party, and were last used by an independent in 1964. Although the Eleventh Circuit upheld the law last year on First Amendment grounds, the part of the case concerning Equal Protection is still pending. That part of the case case had lost in U.S. District Court, but three months ago but the party asked for reconsideration, citing a factual error in the judge’s last decision. The request for rehearing was filed December 4, so it has been pending for three months.

Rick Hasen Podcast on His New Book “A Real Right to Vote”

In an upcoming edition of Ballot Access News, I will be reviewing Rick Hasen’s new book “A Real Right to Vote: How a Constitutional Amendment Can Safeguard American Democracy.”

I recently discovered New Books Network, which has many podcasts involving book authors. Here is New Books Network’s podcast with Professor Hasen from February 15, 2024.