California Bill Would De-Regulate Democratic Party Internal Rules

California Assemblymember Norma Torres (D-Pomona) has introduced AB 1396. It would repeal all election laws that describe how the California Democratic Party is organized. It would require the party to be responsible for its own internal organizational rules, and also would require the party to keep its rules posted on its internet site.

The bill thus acknowledges the U.S. Supreme Court decision Eu v San Francisco County Democratic Central Committee, issued 20 years ago. That decision said state government has no authority to describe how political parties should be organized.

New Mexico Governor Signs Bill Easing Petitions for Major Party Members

On April 7, New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson signed SB 3, which deletes the requirement that members of major parties need any signatures to get on the primary ballot, if they are running for partisan county office, or for certain state executive positions that are elected by district.

Although the bill does not offer any relief to independent candidates, or to members of qualified minor parties (all of whom need petitions), the policy change made by SB 3 will be useful in litigation and future lobbying on behalf of independent and minor party members.

Arkansas Greens Plan New Petition Drive to Regain Spot on Ballot

The Arkansas Green Party is not ballot-qualified for 2010, because it failed to poll 3% for president in 2008 and because its bill to redefine “political party” failed to pass this year. The party is already planning a new petition drive to get back on the ballot, which must be completed in any 90 days of the party’s choosing. The drive will be in 2009.

Minnesota Supreme Court Hears IRV Case on May 13

The Minnesota Supreme Court will hear the case on whether Instant Runoff Voting is consistent with the State Constitution on May 13. The lower court had ruled that there is no conflict between Minneapolis’ IRV law and the State Constitution. The State Supreme Court expedited this case so that the city will have an opportunity to use IRV this year if the city wins in court again.