Center for Competitive Democracy Attorney Asks District of Columbia to Tally Votes for Declared Write-in Presidential Candidates

On December 9, an attorney for the Center for Competitive Democracy wrote a letter to the District of Columbia Board of Elections, and asked that the Board tally the votes for the declared write-in candidates. The most prominent such candidates are Bob Barr and Chuck Baldwin.

The letter points out that in 1974, the D.C. Court of Appeals not only ordered the Board to print write-in space on the November ballot for president, but also said such write-ins should be tallied, for those write-in presidential candidates who file a slate of presidential elector candidates in advance of the election. Barr and Baldwin did so, but the Board still says it need not count such write-ins. The Board has never addressed the 1974 precedent, which is Kamins v D.C. Board of Elections, 324 A 2d 187.

Minor Party and Independent Candidate Vote for U.S. House in 2008

Based on official election returns in 47 states and D.C., and unofficial returns in California, Ohio, and Tennessee, the combined minor party and independent candidate vote for U.S. House last month amounted to 3.13% of the total vote cast for U.S. House. That is higher than the “other” vote for U.S. House had been in 2006 and 2004, but not as high as it had been in 2002 and 2000.

The “other” vote for U.S. House in 2000 was 4.17%, the highest it had been since 1938. In 2002 it declined to 3.58%, and in 2004 it declined again, to 2.75%. It declined a third time in 2006, to 2.49%.

The November 2008 U.S. House vote is: Democrats 53.90%; Republicans 42.96%; Libertarians .89%; independent candidates .80%; Greens .49%; Working Families .24%; Constitution .15%; other parties .55%. These figures could change slightly by the time all the official returns are known.

D.C. Republican Party Sues Board of Elections over At-Large City Council Seat

On December 1, the District of Columbia Republican Party filed a lawsuit against the D.C. Board of Elections, seeking to claim one of the City Council-at-large seats for a Republican candidate.

Washington, D.C., elects two city council-at-large members every two years. Political parties are only permitted to run one nominee for this office. The goal of this law is to prevent D.C. from having a city council that is composed of nothing but Democrats.

Last month, Democratic nominee Kwame R. Brown won one of the seats. He polled 172,272 votes. The second-place finisher, with 71,720 votes, was Michael A. Brown, listed on the ballot as “Independent”. However, the Republican Party charges that Michael A. Brown should not have been on the ballot with the label “independent”, because, the party argues, he was a de facto Democrat. He had been registered Democratic until May 20, 2008, and had voted in the Democratic presidential primary earlier this year. His campaign literature described himself as “Independent*Democrat”, and he held himself out as a leading representative of the Obama campaign.

If Michael A. Brown was “really” a Democrat, he could not have been on the November ballot, since the Democratic Party was only permitted to run one nominee. If Brown is disqualified, the seat would either go to the ballot-listed Republican nominee, Patrick Mara (who polled 37,447 votes), or to Carol Schwartz, an incumbent Republican who ran a write-in campaign. D.C. hasn’t tallied the write-ins for Schwartz, but 39,493 write-ins were cast for City Council-at-Large, so at this point no one knows who got more votes, Schwartz or Mara.

The Republican Party lawsuit is Kabel v D.C. Bd. of Elections, 08-AA-1513, D.C. Court of Appeals.

West Virginia Judges Like Being Elected in Partisan Elections

Last week, the West Virginia Judiciary Association (which is an association of state judges) recommended that the state continue to elect its judges in partisan elections. West Virginia is one of twelve states that elects its state judges in partisan elections. The West Virginia Bar Association had also endorsed partisan elections for judges in 2005. See this story. Thanks to Bill Van Allen for the link.

2008 District of Columbia Libertarian Vote Total was Best in Party’s History

Last month, Libertarian Party nominee Damien Ober polled 5,915 votes for “Shadow” U.S. Senator. The District of Columbia holds elections for U.S. Senate, and U.S. House, even though Congress does not recognize the winners of these elections (the election for U.S. House is separate from the election for Delegate to the U.S. House). Although 5,915 votes is only 2.63%, that is the highest vote total that any Libertarian nominee for partisan office in D.C. has ever polled.

Qualified parties in D.C. are those that poll 7,500 votes for any partisan office. The only qualified parties in D.C. history, besides the Democratic and Republican Parties, have been the Statehood Green Party (formerly the D.C. Statehood Party), the Umoja Party, the Socialist Workers Party, and the U.S. Labor Party.

Previous D.C. Libertarian vote totals (other than for president) have been 3,612 for City Council-at-Large in 1988, 980 for Mayor in 1990, and 4,594 for Delegate to the U.S. House in 2000. For president, no Libertarian has ever polled more than 1,104 votes in D.C. Because the D.C. Libertarian Party has never polled 7,500 votes for any office, it has never been a qualified party.

The U.S. Senate shadow election this year had four candidates. The other three were Democrat Paul Strauss, 183,519 votes; Republican Nelson Rimensynder, 18,601 votes; Statehood Green Keith Ware, 16,881 votes.

Libertarians tried to get Dick Heller on the ballot this year for Delegate to U.S. House. His petition failed, and Bob Barr’s petition also failed. If Heller had qualified, he probably would have received 7,500 votes, since the Delegate’s race had no Republican in the race. The vote totals this year for Delegate are Eleanor Holmes Norton, Democrat, 228,376 votes; Statehood Green, Maude Louise Hills, 16,693 votes.