On August 8, an independent candidate for the U.S. House filed a lawsuit against North Carolina’s procedures for independents for district office. The law requires a petition signed by 4% of the number of registered voters. That law is so strict, in the 107 years since North Carolina has used government-printed ballots, no independent candidate for U.S. House has ever qualified for that ballot. Adding insult to injury, in 2006 the North Carolina legislature amended the law to provide that independent candidates must pay a large filing fee as well as getting the approximately 15,000 to 20,000 signatures. The case is Greene v Bartlett, in U.S. District Court, western district. The Coalition for Free & Open Elections helped fund this case. Thanks to every reader who has ever contributed to COFOE. The case number is 5:08-0088.

On August 7, the South Carolina Green Party filed a lawsuit against the State Election Commission. The Commission refuses to print Eugene Platt on the November ballot as the Green Party candidate for a particular State House seat. This is because, after the Green Party nominated Platt via convention, Platt then also tried to win the Democratic primary for the same office. He barely lost the Democratic primary. Under a somewhat ambiguous South Carolina election law, as interpreted by the state, Platt is now disqualified from being the Green Party nominee because he tried and failed to get the Democratic nomination. The case is South Carolina Green Party v S.C. Election Commission, federal court. This is an ACLU-sponsored lawsuit. South Carolina permits fusion, so if Platt had won the Democratic primary, he would be listed on the November ballot as both a Green and a Democrat.

Platt is a local office-holder and one of the strongest Green Party nominees ever nominated in South Carolina. He had also won the Working Families nomination, so if he wins the lawsuit, he will be listed in November as a Green and perhaps also as the WFP nominee.

South Carolina does not have registration by party.