On September 8, U.S. District Court Judge Dee Benson struck down a Utah campaign finance law. National Right to Work Legal Defense and Education Foundation v Herbert, 2:07-cv-809. Utah law defines “political issues committee” as an entity that…makes disbursements to influence, or tend to influence, directly or indirectly, any person to…assist in keeping a statewide ballot proposition off the ballot, or refrain from voting or vote for or against any statewide ballot proposition.” A political issues committee must register with the state and file frequent reports revealing where it gets its money, and how it spends its money.

The decision says that these disclosure requirements can only be applied to groups whose major purpose is to influence elections. The plaintiff organization is quite old, and has always existed to assist individual union members when a union member has a dispute with his or her union. Utah had tried to force it to obey the disclosure laws because it ran a series of TV and radio ads aimed at members of the Utah Teacher’s Association who weren’t in sympathy with the association’s position on a referendum on school vouchers. The ads said, “If you are a teacher or school employee, you have the right not to participate in the union’s petition drive.” The ads also gave the National Right to Work organization’s toll-free telephone number and its web address. Utah elections officials interpreted this ad as a campaign ad in favor of vouchers and against the referendum petition.

Although the Libertarian Party petitions in the District of Columbia for president, and for Delegate to the U.S. House, did not succeed, one D.C. Libertarian petition did succeed. The party’s candidate for “shadow” U.S. Senate, Damien Lincoln Ober, is on the ballot. He has a striking campaign video, which can be seen at www.shadow08.com.

The race for “shadow” U.S. Senator has three other candidates, those of the Democratic, Republican, and Statehood Green Parties. Thanks to IndependentPoliticalReport for the news.

On September 12, U.S. District Court Judge John Woodcock held a 90-minute hearing in Dobson v Dunlap, 1:08-cv-00292. The issue is whether Laurie Dobson should be on the ballot as an independent candidate for U.S. Senate. She obtained 4,000 valid signatures, and submitted them to the town clerks by the legal deadline, May 27. The law also said that the town clerks had to finish checking the signatures by June 2, but in Dobson’s case, some of the town clerks did not comply. Dobson argues that she should not be punished because the town clerks did not obey the law. Judge Woodcock is expected to rule on September 15, although his ruling may be limited to deciding whether to halt the ballot printing. If he does halt the ballot printing, that would give more time for the eventual decision on whether Dobson’s name should be on the ballot. The lawsuit was not filed until September 9.