Peace & Freedom Plan to Attack Write-in Nomination Barrier Does Not Succeed

California has the nation’s second-most restrictive election law, concerning how a write-in candidate may receive the nomination of a political party at the primary. Only Tennessee’s law is more restrictive. The law requires the write-in candidate at the primary to not only receive the most votes, but to poll a number of write-ins equal to 1% of the vote cast for that office at the last general election. Most states have a threshold that is related to the size of the particular political party, but California’s law does not take the size of the party into consideration. As a result, it is virtually impossible for any minor party to nominate anyone by write-ins at its own primary. No minor party has succeeded since 1968.

The Peace & Freedom Party wants to attack this law in court, and felt that an ideal test case would come about, if there were a Peace & Freedom Party result in which a write-in candidate outpolled a candidate for the same office who was listed on the ballot. Then, the paradox would exist that the ballot-listed person could not be nominated (since he or she had been defeated by the write-in candidate), but the winner couldn’t be nominated either (because of the minimum vote law). The test case was centered on the Assembly, 9th district, in Sacramento. The write-in candidate was C. T. Weber, a former state chair of the party and someone who has been active in the party for decades. Unfortunately, the ballot-listed candidate, Gerald Frink, polled more votes in the June 3, 2008 primary, even though both Frink and Weber and other activists made a concerted effort to reach Peace & Freedom primary voters and ask them to write-in Weber. The final results are 76 for Gerald Frink, and 41 for C. T. Weber.

In other Peace & Freedom Party news, the party has still not found a building in which to hold its state convention. The convention will be in Sacramento, August 2-3, and will choose presidential electors. The choice of presidential electors will determine who will be listed as the party’s presidential nominee.

Peace & Freedom Plan to Attack Write-in Nomination Barrier Does Not Succeed

California has the nation’s second-most restrictive election law, concerning how a write-in candidate may receive the nomination of a political party at the primary. Only Tennessee’s law is more restrictive. The law requires the write-in candidate at the primary to not only receive the most votes, but to poll a number of write-ins equal to 1% of the vote cast for that office at the last general election. Most states have a threshold that is related to the size of the particular political party, but California’s law does not take the size of the party into consideration. As a result, it is virtually impossible for any minor party to nominate anyone by write-ins at its own primary. No minor party has succeeded since 1968.

The Peace & Freedom Party wants to attack this law in court, and felt that an ideal test case would come about, if there were a Peace & Freedom Party result in which a write-in candidate outpolled a candidate for the same office who was listed on the ballot. Then, the paradox would exist that the ballot-listed person could not be nominated (since he or she had been defeated by the write-in candidate), but the winner couldn’t be nominated either (because of the minimum vote law). The test case was centered on the Assembly, 9th district, in Sacramento. The write-in candidate was C. T. Weber, a former state chair of the party and someone who has been active in the party for decades. Unfortunately, the ballot-listed candidate, Gerald Frink, polled more votes in the June 3, 2008 primary, even though both Frink and Weber and other activists made a concerted effort to reach Peace & Freedom primary voters and ask them to write-in Weber. The final results are 76 for Gerald Frink, and 41 for C. T. Weber.

In other Peace & Freedom Party news, the party has still not found a building in which to hold its state convention. The convention will be in Sacramento, August 2-3, and will choose presidential electors. The choice of presidential electors will determine who will be listed as the party’s presidential nominee.

Vermont Governor Starts Re-Election Campaign; Press Covers Race as 3-Way Event

On June 18, incumbent Vermont Governor Jim Douglas, a Republican, began his re-election campaign. Press coverage in Vermont refers to Douglas has having “two major party opponents”, and the press is giving equal coverage to Gaye Symington (likely Democratic nominee for Governor) and Anthony Pollina (Progressive nominee for Governor). For example, see this story.