California Governor Vetoes Instant-Runoff Bill

On October 14, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed AB 1294, the bill to let all cities and counties use Instant-Runoff Voting for elections for their own officers. His veto message says, “This represents a drastic change to the way we vote. I am concerned that we don’t yet know enough about how voters will react to such a dramatic change. Charter cities and counties already have the right to hold ranked voting elections, yet only one city has done so thus far.”

This is absurd logic. Several cities in California have already voted to use Instant-Runoff Voting, but state law prevents them from implementing their choice because they aren’t charter cities.

Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed same-sex marriage two days ago on the grounds that in 2000, the voters of California had indicated they don’t want to recognize same-sex marriages performed in states such as Massachusetts. He said he is upholding the will of the people.

When he vetoed the National Popular Vote plan last year, he said the plan, by conceivably awarding California’s electoral college votes to a candidate who didn’t win in California, would violate the people’s will.

Yet, in his recent vetoes of the IRV bill, and the bill to count write-in votes when the voter forgets to “X” the box, he is revealing that he doesn’t really care about the popular will at all.

Michigan Legislature May Pass Bill Forcing all Democrats Onto Presidential Primary

Michigan legislative leaders are talking about rushing a bill through the legislature that would say that anyone discussed in the news media must be on the presidential primary ballot, unless the candidate signs a statement that he or she is not running for president. Many other states already have similar laws. This would force Democrats such as Barack Obama and John Edwards to be listed on the January 15 Michigan Democratic primary ballot. Under current law, they have the option to refuse to be listed, and they have refused, since the national party doesn’t recognize Michigan’s primary.

Newspaper in New York Suggest Lopez Torres May Yet Win Her U.S. Supreme Court Case

The October 14 issue of the Westchester Journal-News (a daily newspaper covering the three counties north of New York city) carries an op-ed suggesting that the U.S. Supreme Court may rule in favor of Margarita Lopez Torres, in the pending case over primary ballot access. It says, “Perhaps when the high court issues its ruling, New Yorkers will discover that the justices were merely playing devil’s advocate as they fished for answers.” Most of the description and commentary about the October 3 oral argument carried in other newspapers has tended to predict that New York State will win the case. The Westchester Journal-News op-ed is here. Thanks to Bill Van Allen for this.

NY Times Front-Page Story on Repressive Russian Ballot Access Rules

The October 14 New York Times carries a front-page story about new ballot access restrictions in Russia, which are keeping certain parties off the December 2007 Parliamentary ballot even though those same parties were able to elect members of the Duma in the last election. The article is here.

The last election for the Duma was in 2003, when parties needed petitions signed by 10,000 signers to be on the nationwide ballot in Duma elections. The petition says that all signers are members of that party. The Duma has 450 seats. The new rules require 50,000 such signatures throughout the nation. The article does not say how many parties have been able to comply, but it says the Republican Party is being kept off the ballot. The Republican Party and its leader, Vladimir Ryzhkov, are described by the Times as fervent advocates for democracy. Ryzhkov cannot run for re-election because his party was told that it failed to submit 50,000 valid signatures. Ryzhkov says his party easily met the standard, but said officials ignored the evidence in a sham proceeding.