Lopez Torres & Allies File Briefs in U.S. Supreme Court

In the upcoming October 2007 session of the U.S. Supreme Court, the Court will hear its first ballot access case since 1992. It is New York State Board of Elections v Lopez Torres, no. 06-766. The case concerns New York state’s extraordinarily difficult ballot access procedures for people who want to run for Delegate to party judicial nominating conventions. This will be the first time the U.S. Supreme Court has heard a case on primary ballot access petitions.

The state lost the case below, so it filed its briefs first, in May. Now, Lopez Torres and her allies have filed their briefs. Lopez Torres is represented by the Brennan Center, and by the law firms Jenner & Block and Arnold & Porter. Their joint brief for Lopez Torres is very strong. It effectively eviscerates the state’s claim that this is a political party rights case. Instead, as the brief makes clear, it is about a state statute that forces qualified political parties in New York to use a very undemocratic system for choosing nominees for seats on the State Supreme Court.

An amicus brief on Lopez Torres’ side was filed by Charles Hynes, who has been the District Attorney of Brooklyn for the last 15 years. It reveals how the current system (which makes it virtually impossible for anyone to get on the primary ballot for Delegate unless he or she is backed by county party leaders) has promoted extensive corruption. County party leaders use their power over Delegate Conventions to force judicial candidates, and incumbent judges, to hire their own children for prestigious patronage jobs.

Amici briefs on Lopez Torres’ side have also been filed by the City of New York, the New York State Bar Association, the New York city Bar Association, the Fund for Modern Courts, by President George H. W. Bush’s former Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights (John Dunne), by a group of former New York judges, by the American Judicature Society, the Washington Legal Foundation, the Campaign Legal Center, the Reform Institute, by two political scientists (Thomas Mann and Norm Ornstein), by a group of law professors, by former Mayor Ed Koch, by the national ACLU, the New York State ACLU, the New York County Lawyers Association, the Asian American Legal Defense & Educational Fund, the Puerto Rican Legal Defense & Education Fund, the Hispanic National Bar Association, the Puerto Rican Bar Association, the Latino Lawyers Association of Queens, the Center for Law & Social Justice at Medgar Evers College, the Amistad Black Bar Association of Long Island, and the Rochester Black Bar Association. A few more amici briefs are expected.

To read Lopez Torres’ brief, see here. It is 73 pages long.

Oklahoma Ballot Access Initiative Asks For Your Contributions

Oklahomans for Ballot Access Reform is asking for donations to put an initiative on the November 2008 ballot. Contributions can be postally mailed to Oklahomans for Ballot Access Reform, PO Box 14042, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74159-1042.

Oklahoma law does not set any limit on who can contribute, or on how much can be contributed. The money will be used to get an initiative on the ballot that will ease the ballot access law for minor parties. Specifically, it will require 5,000 signatures for a new party. The vote test for a party to remain on the ballot will be 1% for any statewide race, at either of the last two elections. The vote test to remain on is based on Colorado and Wisconsin laws.

Existing Oklahoma laws require a petition of 5% of the last vote cast to get a new party on the ballot, and a 10% vote for the office at the top of the ticket for it to remain on (i.e., president in presidential election years, and governor in mid-term years). For 2008, the existing law requires 46,324 signatures to get a new party on.

Oklahomans for Ballot Access Reform includes independents, and members of the Oklahoma Libertarian, Green and Constitution Parties. Members of other parties are welcome as well. Oklahomans for Ballot Access Reform (OBAR) will hold another meeting on July 22 in Stroud, Oklahoma. The chair of OBAR is Matt Jones, MRJones@JMJCommunications.com.

An anonymous donor has pledged to donate $25,000 to the effort, if the committee can raise as much as $50,000 in the next two months. Signatures would probably be gathered in the period September-October-November 2007. The law requires that an initiative petition collect 74,117 valid signatures in any 90-day period.

Donors who give $50 or more will be sent a short form, required by Oklahoma law, that asks for name, address, occupation and employer or principal business activity, if any. No disclosure of this information is required until or unless the initiative is certified for the ballot.

California Judge Tentatively Rules that Recount Must Include Access to Electronic Innards

On July 12, a California state court ruled tentatively that the right to a recount includes the right to examine the electronic data and system audit logs, when electronic vote-counting machines are used. The case is Americans for Safe Access v County of Alameda, no. RG 04192053, Alameda Co.

On July 13 the judge is expected to finalize that ruling. Thanks to Rick Hasen for this news.

New York Primary Election Law Challenged

On July 12, a federal lawsuit was filed against a New York state law that says if an independent voter changes his or her registration so as to join a ballot-qualified party, that change cannot be effective until the following year. The case is Van Allen v Cuomo, 1:07-cv-722, northern district.

Bill Van Allen re-registered on April 27, 2007, from independent, to being a member of the Independence Party. But New York state law, uniquely, won’t let him be considered a member of that party until 2008. Therefore, he can’t vote in the September 2007 Independence Party primary and he can’t circulate petitions to help members of that party get on the primary ballot. His lawsuit, if successful, would result in New Yorkers being permitted to join parties without the long waiting period.

California Assembly to Vote on 3 Election Bills on Monday, July 16

The California Assembly is expected to vote on three interesting election law bills on Monday, July 16. SB 37 is the National Popular Vote Plan. SB 408 would restrict who could circulate a statewide initiative petition. SB 439 would legalize write-ins when the voter forgets to “X” the box next to the name written in.

UPDATE: The National Popular Vote bill will not be brought up until August.