Ballot Access Rally at U.S. Supreme Court

On September 24, Greens and Libertarians rallied on the north edge of the U.S. Supreme Court Building, hoping to draw public attention to today’s U.S. Supreme Court conference. That conference, which goes on all day, in private, is where the justices decide which cases to hear. On the schedule for today’s conference is Rogers v Cortes, the Pennsylvania ballot access case.

Even though the U.S. Supreme Court itself decided over a decade ago that sidewalks around the Court building are public fora, and that it is legal for demonstrations to be held there, various police officers tried to discourage the rally. The rally was being filmed by documentary film-maker Peter Hwosch. As the speakers were starting, the lawn sprinklers came on just where the group was positioned (the lawn sprinklers didn’t come on anywhere else). The group moved further down the Maryland Avenue sidewalk, but police with police dogs then ordered the group to vacate Maryland Avenue sidewalks entirely, and go to a more remote location. The group complied. It is most unlikely that any U.S. Supreme Court Justices saw the rally.

The Court won’t announce any decisions about which cases are being heard until Tuesday morning, September 25. At the time, cases that have been chosen will be listed. In the Pennsylvania ballot access, it is most likely that if the Court is interested in it at all, it will ask Pennsylvania to respond, but such an order would not be released on September 25; instead it would be on October 1.

DiMaio Lawsuit Assumes New Importance In Florida Primary Date Dispute

Now that the Florida Democratic Party has decided not to comply with national Democratic Party rules over the date of Florida’s presidential primary, the lawsuit DiMaio v Democratic National Committee & Florida Democratic Party (middle district, 8:07-cv-1552) assumes greater importance. That case was filed in federal court on August 30, and both the national and state Democratic Parties will be answering the complaint on September 25. The lawsuit argues that Florida Democratic voters are being disenfranchised in the process of choosing a Democratic presidential candidate. The lawsuit argues that it isn’t the voters’ fault if the national and state parties can’t agree, but that the result is that the Florida Democratic voters will be losing their input if the dispute isn’t resolved one way or another.

Illinois Greens Determined to Have a Presidential Primary

The Illinois Green Party is entitled to a presidential primary, but the state won’t hold one unless at least two candidates qualify for that primary. Illinois law requires all candidates in a presidential primary to submit 3,000 signatures, and they are due in November 2007. Therefore, the Illinois Green Party is helping four Greens with their primary petitions. The four are Kent Mesplay, Jared Ball, Kat Swift and Jesse Johnson.