Notes on May 3 Republican Debate

The Simi Valley Republican presidential debate of May 3 did not cover any matters concerning voting rights or election law, except that each of the 10 presidential candidates was asked about changing the U.S. Constitution to let foreign-born citizens run for President. Rudy Giuliani and Mike Huckabee said “yes”, and John McCain said he is undecided. The others said “no.”

Ron Paul did not utter the word “libertarian”, yet the press coverage of the debate consistently described him with that adjective. The Boston Globe said he is a “fiery libertarian”; Newsweek says he is a “Libertarian Republican”; National Review Online mentioned his “non-interventionist libertarian position”; Bloomberg.com says Paul “echoed the libertarian themes on warrantless searches and foreign policy”; the New York Sun said Paul is a “pure libertarian”; the Long Island Press said Paul is “a one-time Libertarian Party presidential nominee”; the Brazosport Facts (a newspaper in Paul’s district) referred to his “libertarian views”; the Ventura County Star called him “a libertarian who voted against the Iraq war at the outset.” It is almost as though the Libertarian Party was represented in the debate, at least for those voters who are reading the press on May 4.

Quick Activism Needed in Illinois

As reported earlier, the Illinois Senate has unanimously passed SB 733, which sets the minor party and independent petition requirements at approximately one-fourth of 1% of the last vote cast. But the Illinois House has unanimously passed HB 632, which sets them at 5% of the last vote cast.

Anyone who lives in Illinois should contact state legislators and point out that 5% would give Illinois the 2nd most stringent requirement in the country, for district and county office petitions. Every other state except Georgia and Alabama has some procedure onto the general election ballot, for US House and state legislature, that is at or below 2% of the last vote cast. Sometimes that procedure is for minor or new parties; sometimes it is for independent candidates. Only Georgia, Alabama and Illinois set all routes onto the November ballot (for district and county office) at a level above 2% of the last vote cast. Alabama is at 3% of the last gubernatorial vote; Georgia is 5% of the number of registered voters.

For coordination with other Illinois activists, contact Jeff Trigg at 309-282-6139.

Florida Legislative Action on Primary Date May Trigger South Carolina, Iowa, New Hampshire Date Changes

As earlier reported, on May 3 the Florida legislature moved that state’s presidential primary to one week after the New Hampshire primaries. Since the New Hampshire primary is set for January 22, that would mean a January 29 primary for Florida.

Later that day, the South Carolina Republican Party state chair, Katon Dawson, said, “South Carolina is going to move. We’ll do it at Halloween and have our version of trick-or-treat, if that’s the case.” New Hampshire state representative Jim Ryan, an official of that state’s Democratic Party, predicted that New Hampshire will move its primary to an earlier day (no legislative action is needed; the New Hampshire Secretary of State chooses the date). Former Iowa Democratic Party state chair Rob Tully predicted that Iowa would move its caucus to the first week in January.

Hawaii Legislature Will Decide on National Popular Vote Plan in July

Hawaii’s legislature had passed SB 1956, the National Popular Vote Plan, in April. But Governor Linda Lingle had vetoed it. Since then, the Senate overrode her veto. On May 3, the Hawaii legislature adjourned, before the House had voted on whether to override the veto. The legislature will return in July to finish considering which vetoes to override. At that time, the House will vote on SB 1956. If the House does vote to override, Hawaii will join Maryland as one of the states that has approved the Compact.