On January 12, three organizations each filed an amicus curiae brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in New York State Board of Elections v Lopez Torres. This is the ballot access case involving how candidates for Delegate to a Judicial Nominating Convention get on the primary ballot of major parties. All three organizations sided with New York state. They are the Republican National Committee, the Mid-Manhatten Branch of the NAACP, and the Asian American Bar Association of New York. All three are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear New York state’s appeal.
On January 12, three organizations each filed an amicus curiae brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in New York State Board of Elections v Lopez Torres. This is the ballot access case involving how candidates for Delegate to a Judicial Nominating Convention get on the primary ballot of major parties. All three organizations sided with New York state. They are the Republican National Committee, the Mid-Manhatten Branch of the NAACP, and the Asian American Bar Association of New York. All three are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear New York state’s appeal.
In the Oklahoma House of Representatives, the bill to improve ballot access for new and minor parties is HB1359, by Rep. Marian Cooksey. Her bill is identical to the bill in the State Senate, SB 28, by Senator Randy Brogdon.
If there has ever been a situation when it should be easy to lobby for a ballot access bill, it ought to be Oklahoma right now. In November 2004, Oklahoma voters who wanted to vote for someone for president other than President Bush and Senator John Kerry were not permitted to vote at all. No one else was on the ballot in Oklahoma, and no write-ins are permitted in Oklahoma. The November 2004 election in Oklahoma was not free. The right to vote includes the right of choice for whom to vote. If the legislature won’t grant relief, and if the State Courts don’t grant relief, this situation will recur in Oklahoma. The Oklahoma Constitution mandates that elections be “free”.
Doug Bailey, founder of the Political Hotline, and long active in consulting for Republican candidates, is one of the founders of Unity08. He spoke in Sacramento on January 17 at a panel organized by the Commonwealth Club. The panel discussed the growing number of voters who register as independents and as members of minor parties.
After the formal part of the meeting, Bailey continued talking about Unity08. He made it plain that Unity08 will qualify as a political party in most states, even though the founders of Unity08 are not trying to start a new permanent party. However, in states in which it is relatively easy to qualify an independent presidential candidate, and in which the deadline for doing so is quite late in the year (for example, Minnesota, which requires only 2,000 signatures due in mid-September of the election year), Unity08 will not qualify itself as a “qualified” party.
For California, which requires 158,372 signatures for an independent (more than twice as many as any other state), Unity08 will instead use the new party route.
If the California legislature becomes aware of this development, it may be possible to persuade the California legislature that the number of signatures for independent presidential candidates should be reduced. California Democratic and Republican Party officials and legislators would probably prefer that Unity08 used the independent procedure, because otherwise an on-going new political party will arise in California; invariably people will run in its primary for legislative office.
The new chair of the Pennsylvania House State Government Committee (the committee that handles election law bills) is a veteran legislator with many ties to good-government activist groups. She is Babette Josephs, a Board Member of the Pennsylvania American Civil Liberties Union since 1970. She represents the 182nd district, in south Philadelphia. She is an attorney and a Democrat. She has been in the legislature since 1984.