Amy Goodman interviewed Cornel West on June 7. She asked him why he is seeking the nomination of the Peoples Party, when the Green Party has far superior ballot access. West responded by mentioning his love for the Green Party, and then he added, “It would be nice if we had even a coming together.” See here. That quote is toward the end of the interview.
As has previously been reported, the Iowa legislature this year passed rules for party caucuses that ban caucus delegates who aren’t physically present. This analysis explains how that impacts the Libertarian Party, which is the only ballot-qualified party in Iowa other than the Republican and Democratic Parties. The author, Joseph Howe, a former state chair of the Iowa Libertarian Party, suggests that the party might sue, or it might ignore the new law.
On June 8, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against Alabama in the lawsuit over U.S. House districts. The vote was 5-4. This will be headline news in all media, so there is no need for a longer blog post. The case is Allen v Milligan, 21-1086. Here is the decision.
The Alabama legislature is still in session, and will probably pass a new districting plan for U.S. House. If it does not, presumably the lower federal courts will draw up a new plan.
On June 6, Idaho Attorney General Raul Labrador issued an opinion, saying the initiative to set up a top-four system, which is about to start circulating, violates the “single-subject” rule for initiatives. The opinion says that whether or not Idaho should use ranked choice voting is a separate subject than whether to abolish the ability of parties to have nominees.
If the proponents of the initiative wish to go ahead, they are free to do so. The Attorney General’s Opinion does not prevent the proponents from sticking to their text.
The Opinion also says that the State Constitution, which requires election by plurality, does not permit Ranked Choice Voting.
The Arizona Secretary of State posts updated registration data every calendar quarter. The April 1, 2023 tally is the first one to include the No Labels Party. See it here. It shows 17 registered voters in that party. When the July 1 data is posted, undoubtedly No Labels will have a higher number.
By comparison, the June 1, 2023 Colorado registration tally shows 1,070 registered members of No Labels. The Oregon Secretary of State’s June 1 tally still doesn’t include No Labels; the office says they are temporarily listed in the “other” column.
