Connecticut Independent Party Has Contested Nominating Convention

On August 23, the Connecticut Independent Party, which is ballot-qualified for most state and federal offices, held its nominating convention. The apparent result is that the party nominated Rob Hotaling for Governor, instead of the Republican nominee Bob Stefanowski. However, the process is contested and will result in a lawsuit. See this story.

The Independent Party of Connecticut nominated its own member for Governor in 2010, but it nominated the Republican gubernatorial nominee in 2014 and 2018. Thanks to Fairvote for the link.

Tara Sweeney, Alaska U.S. House Candidate Who Placed Fourth in Primary, Withdraws; Libertarian Who Placed Fifth Now Qualifies for General Election

Alaska held its top-four primary on August 16. For U.S. House, Republican Tara Sweeney finished fourth with 3.71% of the vote, thus entitling her to appear on the November ballot. But on August 23, she withdrew. Because she withdrew as early as she did, the law says the fifth-place finisher can take her place on the November ballot. Chris Bye, a Libertarian, had finished fifth with .63% of the vote, so he can run in November. See this story.

The other three candidates are two Republicans (Sarah Palin and Nick Begich) and Democrat Mary Peltola. Thanks to J. R. Myers for this news.

Independent Centrist Candidate for U.S. Senate in Missouri Withdraws

On August 23, John Wood, independent centrist candidate for U.S. Senate in Missouri, withdrew his candidacy. He had collected the 10,000 required signatures to be on the ballot before the primary was held. At the Republican Senate primary, Eric Greitens was defeated, so the Wood candidacy has less importance. This is an example of why states should have independent candidate deadlines at least a month after the primary is over, so potential independents can make an informed choice about whether to run. Thanks to Ken Bush for the news.

U.S. District Court Strikes Down Arkansas Law That Says No One Can Assist More than Six Voters at the Polls

On August 19, U.S. District Court Judge Timothy Brooks, an Obama appointee, struck down a fairly new Arkansas law that makes it a crime for anyone (other than a polling place official) to assist more than six voters at the polls for any given election. Arkansas United v Thurston, w.d., 5:20cv-5193. Here is the Opinion.

The plaintiff organization specializes in helping immigrant voters. Volunteers for the organization arrange to meet voters at the polls. Most of the assistance involves translation assistance. The ruling finds that the law is barred by the federal Voting Rights Act. Thanks to Michael Drucker for news about the decision.

People’s Party of Florida Informs Eleventh Circuit of Florida State Court Decision in Rebekah Jones Case

On August 23, the People’s Party of Florida notified the Eleventh Circuit about the August 22 decision of a Florida state appeals court decision putting Rebekah Jones on the primary ballot for U.S. House. See the filing here in People’s Party of Florida v Florida Department of State, 22-12451.

Both the People’s Party, and the Rebekah Jones candidacy, had been barred from the ballot by the Florida law that says no one may run in a primary who has not been a member of the party for a full year before filing. The State Court of Appeals on August 22 had restored Rebekah Jones to the Democratic primary, saying that if the candidates certifies that she is eligible, no one can dispute that.

The People’s Party wants to place Elise Mysels on the November ballot as its nominee for Pasco County Commission. If Mysels does not get on the ballot, the voters will have no choice for that election because there are no other candidates except for an unopposed slate of Republicans. Mysels could not have been a member of the People’s Party for a full year before qualifying because the People’s Party wasn’t on the ballot that early, and voters in Florida cannot be registered into an unqualified party. The U.S. District Court Judge had ruled against the People’s Party, citing the “Purcell Principle”, which he believed bars adding candidates to the ballot in an election year. Obviously the state court in the Jones cases didn’t think the “Purcell Principle” bars adding candidates to the ballot by court order in the middle of the election year.