On August 7, the petition to get Kanye West on the Wisconsin ballot was challenged. See this story. Thanks to Mark Seidenberg for this news.
On August 7, the petition to get Kanye West on the Wisconsin ballot was challenged. See this story. Thanks to Mark Seidenberg for this news.
I understand that the election office was locked, due to COVID scare, and they had to wait for somebody to unlock it. If so, this challenge should be thrown out.
Lane Ruhland, ESQ. has no conflict between Trump and West. She was working to get Presidential Electors on the ballot in Wisconsin for West. The Republicans have not yet had there convention yet. The Wisconsin Election Board should through these filing out.
There are probably other grounds to challenge. And even if not, the building being closed earlier than the office inside is not unique and not even necessarily due to covid. His signatures are being thrown out in every other state for not being valid or even real and none of the numerous volunteers gathering signatures on another petition in Wisconsin ran into any of his petitioners in any town or heard any reports of them working or talked to anyone who signed with them except in Madison on the last day which seems to be a pattern with them.
There’s about a 99 percent chance that most of these signatures are garbage like in every other state where anyone looked at kayne petitions. Not one has made it yet that I’ve seen other than states where he just had to pay a fee, and some of those are even in doubt due to problems with elector and vp filing etc.
Wookie,
I only see a 12th Amendment problem In Wyoming and maybe in California if a Wyoming elector was selected in
California by the AIP that was backing West. Wyoming get only 3 Presidential Electors and California has 55 Presidential Electors. The real question is does West have 4.025 valid signatures in Wyoming.
You lost me on that one but the bottom line seems to be that he is not submitting enough valid signatures anywhere.
Wookie,
12th Amendment to the Constitution does not allow Presidential Electors to vote for both a POTUS and VPOTUS from the same state the Presidential Elector is
an inhabitant of. West running mate is also an inhabitant of Wyoming.
Doesn’t it bother you that Rocky De La Fuente is possibly a Mexican citizen?
That would only be a problem for Wyoming electors and only if they win the electoral vote there, and then one of them could still move before the electoral college meet as.
What’s your evidence that Rocky is not a USA citizen?
I think he’s a dual citizen.
Evidence, facts?
He was raised in Mexico to Mexican migrants, went to school in Mexico, and owns businesses in Mexico. I think it’s a valid question much more so than some nonexistent link between Kanye West and Ugand.
Exactly
Oh you agree with yourself. That’s special.
First of all where you getting this information. How may someone check the fact checkers alleged facts? From what I have heard from people who actually know him, he does spend time and conduct business in Latin America but it’s not Mexico. Second, were his parents naturalized U.S. citizens when he was born, and was he born in the USA? Has he claimed Mexican citizenship and does tBe government of Mexico acknowledge him as a Mexican citizen? How would someone who wants to know verify objective facts here?
For NON- trolls/Morons —
Citizenship = ALLEGIANCE to a nation-state AT birth [via Father] —
place of birth irrelevant.
See last para of 1776 DOI.
Naturalization = CHANGE of ALLEGIANCE to a nation-state AFTER birth —
sometimes large scale – 1783 USA-Brit Peace Treaty, 1803 LA Purchase, 1819 Florida Treaty, etc. [adult citizens of foreign regimes residing in added USA areas generally given option to become instant USA citizens – along with their minor children].
Few surviving USA Indians naturalized in 1924 and 1940 USA laws.
SCOTUS – brain dead legal history MORONS about ***and subject to the jurisdiction thereof*** in 14-1 — ie having ALLEGIANCE to USA Const/regime]
See 1866 USA Senate debates adding such language – part of re-doing Secs 1-4 of 14 Amdt.
1898 SCOTUS moron op like the 1896 separate racism is equal nonsense op [latter over-ruled in 1954 Brown v Bd of Ed]
Birther bs. But as far as. I know Rockies parents were USA citizens.
Rocky was born in San Diego, but grew up mainly in Mexico. He’s been clear about that.
Yeah that does not make him a Mexican citizen. Try again.
100 percent agreed.
Thus — 2-1-5 Nat born Citiz [NBC] Prez qualif. =
USA Citizen AT BIRTH via USA Citizen father.
— due to birth stuff in olde rotted monarch/oligarch gangster regimes in pre-1787 Europe
— stuff like multi-folks watching births of future possible monarchs, etc. and making witness statements.
—
CQ-
Perhaps– the Democrats and their allies are true COMMUNIST scum etc. ???
Such commies LOVE all the foreign illegal invader pregnant women giving birth one inch inside the USA to each kid having a foreign father and claiming the kid to be a NBC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocky_De_La_Fuente
part-
Early life and education
De La Fuente was born on October 10, 1954, at Mercy Hospital in San Diego, California,[10] the son of automobile dealer and business park developer[11] Roque Antonio De La Fuente Alexander[12] (circa 1923 – 2002)[11] and Bertha Guerra Yzaguirre. His parents raised him in Mexico (Mexico City, Tijuana, Baja California), and in the United States (San Diego and Anaheim).
***
FN 12 “Roque De La Fuente, Business Park Innovator and Developer”. Los Angeles Times. April 30, 2002. Retrieved November 9, 2015.
—-
NO mention if father was a USA Citizen.
Most olde birth certificates do NOT show the nation-state / ALLEGIANCE status of birth father.
A giant purge of voters may happen shortly – with some emergency naturalization stuff.
Only in your diseased mind.
And still zero evidence about the dual citizenship claim. People here have odd ideas about what counts as evidence of arguments.