One of the amici filed in Trump v Anderson, 23-719, the Colorado ballot access case, says that the U.S. Supreme Court ought to rule that state election officials have no authority to decide whether a candidate is an insurrectionist. The amicus in general is persuasive and may be useful to the Court.
However, the amicus contains a gross error of fact. The author seems to believe that governments could determine who ran for office in 1868, when the Fourteenth Amendment was written. It says on page 7, “It would have been ironic indeed for the Reconstruction Congress to believe Section Three would be fully and faithfully enforced on nothing more than the good faith of Southern Secretaries of State.”
There were no government-printed ballots in 1868. Ballots were private. State election officials had no ability to keep anyone from running for office. The amicus, on page 20 and beyond, seems to understand that, because it cites various state court decisions from the late 1860’s and early 1870’s, in which persons thought to be insurrectionists were elected to office in the south, and after they had been elected, various individuals sue to prevent them from being sworn into office.
The amicus is filed by the Secretaries of State of Missouri, Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Tennessee, and West Virginia. The Missouri Secretary of State organized the amicus for the other states. All these Secretaries of State are Republicans.