Ohio Secretary of State’s Office Still Won’t Say Whether he Will Remove the Minor Parties from the 2012 Ballot

Matthew Damschroder, Ohio Director of Elections, still has not decided whether his office will disqualify the Constitution, Green, Libertarian and Socialist Parties from the 2012 ballot. However, if he follows the precedent set by former Secretary of State Ted Brown in 1972, he will leave them on the ballot.

In 1970, the Socialist Labor Party won a lawsuit against the Ohio ballot access law for minor parties. That unconstitutional law required a party to submit a petition of 7% of the last gubernatorial vote in order to get on the ballot, and to poll 7% of vote for the office at the top of the ballot in order to remain on the ballot. In response, in 1971 the legislature lowered the petition to 1% of the last vote cast, and lowered the vote test to 5%.

The Socialist Labor Party had not met the new 5% vote test in 1970. It only polled .44% for Governor in 1970. Also in 1970, the American Independent Party only polled 1.93% for Governor. Nevertheless, Secretary of State Ted Brown left the two parties on the ballot for 1972.

In November 2010, none of the ballot-qualified minor parties polled as much as 5% for Governor, nor had they petitioned in 2010. They were on the ballot in 2010, and 2008, because the old ballot access law had been held unconstitutional in 2006, and the legislature had not passed a new law. Therefore, the position of those four modern-day minor parties is perfectly analogous to the sitution in 1972 for the Socialist Labor and American Independent Parties. By precedent, the current Ohio Secretary of State ought to leave the four minor parties on the ballot in 2012.


Comments

Ohio Secretary of State’s Office Still Won’t Say Whether he Will Remove the Minor Parties from the 2012 Ballot — No Comments

  1. Pingback: Ohio Secretary of State’s Office Still Won’t Say Whether he Will Remove the Minor Parties from the 2012 Ballot | ThirdPartyPolitics.us

  2. It might help each of the parties if they were to announce candidates for US Senate and other offices. Matt Damschroder would be less likely to keep candidates off the ballot rather than parties with no announced candidates.

    I met Matt a few years ago during the Kilroy/Pryce recount, and found him to be very interested in the plight of opposition parties.

    Heck of a nice guy.

    PEACE

  3. Is there a government of LAWS in OH (and many other States)

    — or a government of robot party hacks — making up ad hoc stuff ???

    NO ballot access laws = mandamus in the courts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.