Another Sad Case of Pennsylvania Ballot Access Injustice

See this story for the melodramatic story of how a Pennsylvania Democrat who tried to run for the state legislature this year was knocked off the ballot before anyone even checked to see if her petition is valid. The reporter says she “only” needed 300 signatures, implying that the requirement is easy. It is not easy. The typical State House district in Pennsylvania has approximately 20,000 registered Democrats, and they are the only voters eligible to sign. Furthermore, no one can circulate a primary petition in Pennsylvania if the circulator doesn’t live in the district.

Before 1985, candidates for State House needed 100 signatures to get on the ballot in a primary. The 1985 session of the legislature tripled the legislative requirement and increased the statewide petition by a factor of ten, from 200 to 2,000 signatures. Pennsylvania is also the only state that still has a county distribution requirement for statewide petitions, even though such county distribution requirements were struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1969. The Pennsylvania state courts repeatedly uphold ballot access restrictions that have been struck down in federal courts. Thanks to Bill Van Allen for the link.


Comments

Another Sad Case of Pennsylvania Ballot Access Injustice — No Comments

  1. Will it take another Gen. G. Washington to liberate the People of PA from the tyrant regime ???

  2. Wow, sounds like she had a horrible lawyer, in addition to the ballot access hurdle.
    Any idea if she plans to run a write-in campaign for the GOP nomination (that is allowed in PA)?

  3. The link in the story is to a page that no longer is there, trying to following it gets a message “Sorry, no posts matched your criteria.”. The publication published a retraction “A PhillyNow blog post on March 16 titled “Accusations Fly in Philly Ballot-Access Case for 185th District” mistakenly included an unsubstantiated assertion concerning Mu’min Islam, the attorney representing community activist Fareeda Mabry in a state ballot-access challenge. Philadelphia Weekly regrets the error and retracts the blog post.”

    What was the “unsubstantiated assertion” and what else was in the blog post that prompted Richard to post this story on BAN?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.