New Mexico Libertarian Party Recruits its First Gubernatorial Nominee

According to this story, Tim Walsh will seek the New Mexico Libertarian gubernatorial nomination. He was an advisor to former Gary Johnson on education, when Johnson was the state’s Republican Governor 1995-2003. He is also a retired school teacher.

The New Mexico Libertarian Party has never before had a gubernatorial nominee. It is the only state in which the party has never had a gubernatorial nominee on the ballot, although the Rhode Island Libertarian Party has not had one since 1976. Thanks to Independent Political Report for the link.


Comments

New Mexico Libertarian Party Recruits its First Gubernatorial Nominee — 94 Comments

  1. Ballot access in New Mexico for office other than president is difficult. Qualified minor parties nominate by convention. But, except for president, they must submit a 1% petition for their nominee, which makes no sense because the party is already ballot-qualified. That law, which is unique in the nation, has meant very few minor party candidates for office in New Mexico in the last 40 years. The Libertarian Party is a major party now, so it doesn’t have that problem. There is still a petition to get the candidate on the primary ballot, but it is only a few hundred signatures.

  2. New Mexico has petitions to place Democrats and Republicans on primary ballots, except presidential candidates can be exempted from it.

  3. Andy, those petitions needed by Democrats and Republicans doesn’t contradict what I wrote above. Those Democrats and Republicans are not party nominees at that point. It is idiotic for New Mexico to force qualified minor parties to submit petitions for people who have already gained the minor party nomination (at a convention). An analogy would be if the state required Democrats and Republicans who had won a primary, to then submit a petition to be on the November ballot. Of course if anyone suggested that, they would be considered crazy. If the person had won the primary, what would be the point of the general election petition? Yest that is what New Mexico does to people who won a convention nomination.

  4. I don’t believe he’s a real libertarian. Real libertarians are people like Ron Paul, HHHoppe, Lew Rockwell, Nathan Norman, Bob Barr, Wayne Root, Augustus Invictus, David Macko, Ryan Ramsey, Chris Cantwell, Andy Jacobs, Jeremy Kauffman, Caryn Ann Harlos, Gary North, Richard Spencer, and people like that. This guy sounds like a fake Gary Johnson, Bill Weld type “libertarian.”

  5. Mr. Winger,

    The point of requiring convention nominee’s to petition for the general election ballot is to reduce ballot crowding and ensure that those nominees have sufficient public support to merit the voter’s consideration.

    The Democratic and Republican nominees have demonstrated public support, not just through the few hundred signatures they gathered to qualify for the primary, but by making it through a primary in which a large number of voters participated. Convention nominees, on the other hand, may have won over the crowd in the back of a Denny’s, library or interstate motel conference room, or someone’s back yard barbecue.

    You can certainly disagree with the logic of that exclusionary law, but it does your readers no service to pretend that no such logic exists.

  6. “Paul on December 9, 2021 at 5:39 am said:
    I don’t believe he’s a real libertarian. Real libertarians are people like Ron Paul, HHHoppe, Lew Rockwell, Nathan Norman, Bob Barr, Wayne Root, Augustus Invictus, David Macko, Ryan Ramsey, Chris Cantwell, Andy Jacobs, Jeremy Kauffman, Caryn Ann Harlos, Gary North, Richard Spencer, and people like that. This guy sounds like a fake Gary Johnson, Bill Weld type ‘libertarian.'”

    Interesting mix of names from the troll Paul, or whoever it is who wants us to think that this is “Paul”? Maybe it is Faul, as in Fake Paul. It kind of sounds like something he would say though, in a sarcastic manner, and in his opinion.

  7. Paul, why would you include Jeremy Kauffman and Wayne Root on a list of real libertarians? You must be a Zionist, and probably Mossad, JUDF, or HASBARA. If you have not moved to the Sinai yet,hurry up and get moving!

    Andy Jacobs is suspect too. Even though he says Jacobs is not a Zionist name, and I believe him, he did very recently reveal that he voted for, and does not even regret voting for, Marxist blm supporter Jo Jorgensen and Zionist neocon Spike Cohen. Is Andy Jacobs a real libertarian, or is he a sleeper fake libertarian? He comes off like a real, patriotic,Alex Jones type of libertarian. And yet, he does not get on board the Trump train like all real libertarians do. Was he really fooled by the Zionist agent Frankel for year’s and betrayed as we have been led to believe,or were he and Frankel in cahoots all along, and are only pretending to be at odds now?

  8. Why would Paul not include Roger Stone as a real libertarian? Why would he omit Jo Jorgensen and Spike Cohen in the list of fake libertarians? Is he the Zionist agent Paul?

  9. Mr. Jacobs, while it is of course obvious that Zionists like Root and Kauffman can not be real libertarians as any real libertarian can immediately understand, are there any other names on the list of real libertarians that you don’t think exemplify real libertarians? Your answer may reveal a lot about you.

    You’re already on thin ice because 1. The last name you don’t like to post sounds like a Zionist, even though you say it’s not, 2. You are not a Trump supporter, 3. You continue to defend your vote for Marxist BLM Jo Jo and her neocon Zionist sidekick, 4. You were closely associated with known Zionist agent Frankel for year’s and may have just faked your split from him once it became too obvious that he is a paid Zionist troll.

    Can you prove the charges against you? If not, I think it’s fair to conclude that you are a liar and a Zionist agent just like those you voted for and spent years if not decades being closely tied to. In which case, should we really take you at your word that Jacobs is not a Zionist name? Because it sure sounds like one to me!

  10. Who is Mr. Jacobs? I know there are several other Andy’s who post here , such as, Andy Gonzalez, Andy Too, Andy Stitzer, Andy Candy, Andy Smirnoff, and Andy No Last Name. I’ve never heard of an Andy Jacobs though. Are you saying that the Andy above is Jacob’s? And how do you know that???

  11. Eric Dondero must be at the top of any list of real libertarians, along with every real libertarian he says is a real libertarian, like Rudy Giuliani. I’m not Eric, or even a libertarian at all, and even I know that much.

  12. Andy Jacobs is off at another blog at this very moment carrying out an unprovoked and unmerited attack on the real libertarian, Nathan Norman. He is accusing Mr. Norman of crimes committed by cyberpig Paul Frankel. This lends credence to the theory that Jacob’s a fake libertarian, Zionist agent, and secretly still in cahoots with the cyberpig.

  13. “Andy Frankel Norman on December 9, 2021 at 6:40 am said:
    Andy Jacobs is off at another blog at this very moment carrying out an unprovoked and unmerited attack on the real libertarian, Nathan Norman. He is accusing Mr. Norman of crimes committed by cyberpig Paul Frankel. This lends credence to the theory that Jacob’s a fake libertarian, Zionist agent, and secretly still in cahoots with the cyberpig.”

    I am not necessarily accusing “Nathan Norman” of thigs done by Paul. Some of these posts we know were from Paul, but not all of them. The question is who else. I think “Nathan Norman” (I doubt this is his real name, but who knows) has done some trolling, but he is not the only one.

  14. “Andy Norman on December 9, 2021 at 6:30 am said:
    Who is Mr. Jacobs? I know there are several other Andy’s who post here , such as, Andy Gonzalez, Andy Too, Andy Stitzer, Andy Candy, Andy Smirnoff, and Andy No Last Name. I’ve never heard of an Andy Jacobs though. Are you saying that the Andy above is Jacob’s? And how do you know that???”

    You must not have been following the Libertarian Party very closely.

  15. “Robert Norman on December 9, 2021 at 6:19 am said:
    Mr. Jacobs, while it is of course obvious that Zionists like Root and Kauffman can not be real libertarians as any real libertarian can immediately understand, are there any other names on the list of real libertarians that you don’t think exemplify real libertarians? Your answer may reveal a lot about you.”

    Jeremy Kauffman is a Zionist? I had never heard this. I will reserve judgement about him until I get more information.

    Bob Barr and Wayne Root should get taken off of that list. Although, I will give Wayne Root credit for coming out against the COVID mandates recently.

    I would take Nathan Norman off of the list as well. He should not be taken seriously, and who knows if that is even his real name.

    Augustus Sol Invictus ended up abandoning libertarianism sometime after he left the Libertarian Party. He ended up going to jail for about a year or so, but the charges against him turned out to be false, and he was released. I know he started up a new internet show, but I think he just talks about the law and does not talk about politics anymore. I listened to part of one episode, but I have not kept up with him, so I don’t know what his current views are, or if he even espouses his views in public anymore.

    Christopher Cantwell moved away libertarianism while he was in jail in Charlottesville on false, trumped up charges. He was out for awhile, but then got ensnared again on another round of false, trumped up charges, which has landed him in prison. Hopefully while he is in prison he will reexamine some of his views and decide to embrace liberty again.

    I met David Macko in person at a Libertarian Party convention. I think it was the 2018 convention in New Orleans. I only spoke to him for a few minutes. I had talked to him online a few times, as he used to post in my Libertarian For 9/11 Truth group. I think that he was a libertarian, but he died a few years ago. I think he died in 2019.

    Eric Dondero-Rittberg would NOT belong on my list of libertarians.

    Rudy Giuliani is obviously not a libertarian.

    Roger Stone is not a libertarian.

    I still regard Alex Jones as a libertarian, in spite of his support for Donald Trump. I think he supported Trump because he saw Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden as the greater threat, which they very well probably are. I never supported Trump because I just never thought he was good enough to merit supporting, even if he is the “Lesser evil” as compared to Hillary and Biden, he just was not “less evil” enough for me.

    The rest of the list looks pretty good.

    I think Jo Jorgensen is a libertarian, but she’s a bit naive. I really did not like her comment on immigration of “let them all in,” and I cringed when she claimed that immigrants do not commit anymore crime than native born (she obviously has not read any FBI statistics and demographic crime reports, or looked at any demographic voting trends either for that matter). Jo was still good for the most part, in spite of some of her cringey left wing SJW style virtue signaling. She called for ending the Federal Reserve System and fiat currency. She called for ending the income tax and replacing it with nothing. She called for repealing all of the gun control laws. The called for pulling the US military out of all of these foreign countries. She called for ending the welfare state, and getting the government out of healthcare and education. She called for ending NSA warrantless spying. She was not as good as Harry Browne or Michael Badnarik or Ron Paul, but she was better than Bob Barr and Gary Johnson.

    Spike Cohen has raised his profile since his VP run, which he would not have won had Larry Sharpe not dropped out of the VP race after the first round of voting. Spike is a bit too far to the left in my opinion, with some of the same flaws as Jorgensen, but I agree with most of what he says, so I’m not going to put him down. We was certainly better than Bill Weld.

  16. Oy gevalt! SHUSH SHTILL! I would never be associated with that right wing schmuck Andy Jacobs ever again. It is an insult to me to suggest that I would. I hated every second of the time that the Elders of Zion assigned me to spy on Jacobs and pretend to be his friend. As if.

    But when you’re a Zionist secret agent, you don’t just say no the Elders of Zion. That should go without saying. I did what I had to do, like it or not. Please, Elders, don’t make me do it again!

    I am happy here in the Sinai. Just don’t tell the Egyptians because I’m afraid they’re going to get mad at me. And especially don’t tell any of their gods. Just because our God beat their gods doesn’t guarantee we’d win a rematch. So please everyone don’t tell them.

    Jacobs is really not a Zionist name. While there is a Zionist name like that , I did enough recon to determine that Andy Jacobs is really a true Gentile. Which was a huge relief, I must say. The research sucked, was really hard, and left a bad taste in my mouth. So don’t ever insult us Zionists by saying he’s one of us ever again!

  17. I don’t follow the so called libertarian party. But I do follow the comments here.

  18. Why would Andy Jones Jacobs question if Jeremy Kauffman is a Zionist or not? ANY real libertarian would just look at the name and know right away that that’s a Zionist. This adds further proof that Andy J is not a real libertarian either. One transgression might be understood. After all, even Alex Jones once had a Zionist wife. But there are way too many here for it to be a coincidence. Besides which, are there really any such things as coincidences, really?

  19. “Zionist Agent Paul on December 9, 2021 at 7:14 am said:
    Oy gevalt! SHUSH SHTILL! I would never be associated with that right wing schmuck Andy Jacobs ever again. It is an insult to me to suggest that I would. I hated every second of the time that the Elders of Zion assigned me to spy on Jacobs and pretend to be his friend. As if.

    But when you’re a Zionist secret agent, you don’t just say no the Elders of Zion. That should go without saying. I did what I had to do, like it or not. Please, Elders, don’t make me do it again!

    I am happy here in the Sinai. Just don’t tell the Egyptians because I’m afraid they’re going to get mad at me. And especially don’t tell any of their gods. Just because our God beat their gods doesn’t guarantee we’d win a rematch. So please everyone don’t tell them.”

    LOL!!! This is an obvious troll post.

  20. It was hiding in plain sight. Even though it’s basically all true, I can say it,because most likely,nobody, will believe me. I hid in plain sight for year’s, so I’m pretty good at it, don’t you think?

  21. I’m glad that Andy at least acknowledges that Richard Spencer, Gary North, and Ryan Ramsey exemplify what it means to be a real libertarian. Maybe Andy is not all that bad after all? I understand what some people are saying here about him being an undercover Zionist, and while I do urge caution, I can’t jump to that conclusion right away.

  22. “Robert Norman on December 9, 2021 at 7:23 am said:
    Why would Andy Jones Jacobs question if Jeremy Kauffman is a Zionist or not? ANY real libertarian would just look at the name and know right away that that’s a Zionist. This adds further proof that Andy J is not a real libertarian either. One transgression might be understood. After all, even Alex Jones once had a Zionist wife. But there are way too many here for it to be a coincidence. Besides which, are there really any such things as coincidences, really?”

    One does not have to be Jewish to be a Zionist. There are Christian Zionists. Joe Biden calls himself a Zionist, and he is not Jewish.

    I did not think that Kauffman was a Jewish name. I thought that it is one of those shared German or Jewish names. Last names do not necessarily indicate ones ethnic background anyway.

    Jeremy Kauffman sounds like a libertarian from what I know about him, but it is not like I am an expert on the guy. I would have to find out more information.

    I think it turned out that Alex Jones’ ex-wife was only partially Jewish. I think that she had partial Jewish ancestry, but was not really Jewish herself. I heard she was a Christian.

    I am not Jewish, nor do I have any Jewish ancestry of which I am aware. If I do, it would have to go back pretty far. I was raised Christian, but I am not really into organized religion. I suppose I am more of a Cultural Christian, in that I am in general agreement with Christian values. I am also not a Zionist.

    There are people who are Jewish that have the last name Jacobs, but it is not an exclusively Jewish name. There are more non-Jewish Jacobs than there are Jewish Jacobs.

    I am not even sure if Jacobs is even my original last name. My father’s mother said that my father’s father changed his last name, in order to have a last name that would make some people think he might be Jewish. He did this because he worked as an engineer on ships, and a lot of the people who did the hiring on the docks were Jews. I asked her what the original last name was. She said she could not remember, but she thought it would have been closer to Jacobson or Jacobsen, without having Jacob in it. It was likely a Dutch/Flemish origin name. There are people with the last name Jacobs in that region, and in fact among Dutch Afrikaners, Jacobs is a very common last name. Lots of Christians took names out of the bible. Jacob is a biblical name. There was also a Roman name, Jacobus. I could not ask my father’s father about the last name, because at the time this conversation took place he was dead. All of my great-grandparents died long before I was born. My father’s father died before he was born, so my father never knew him either. My father’s father’s father was an immigrant from the Flanders, or Dutch, region of Belgium. He came to America in the very early 1900’s. I think it was 1903 or 1907 or something like that. I don’t know if Jacobs was his original last name or not. If the story from my father’s mother is true, his original last name might have been Jensen or Janssens, or something like that, but maybe she is wrong and maybe it was Jacobs. I don’t know. He fought in the US military in World War 1 and I saw in his military record that he was listed as being a Christian. He came into the country as a legal immigrant, in pre-welfare state America, and he spoke English.

    Around 62.5% of my ancestors were NOT immigrants. They were pioneers and/or colonists. I think at least 52% of my ancestry is from the British Iles, England, Scotland, and Ireland. I had ancestor from England and Scotland that were here in the 1600’s, and some of them went on to fight in the American Revolution as revolutionaries. I also had ancestors who were from France who were here in the 1600’s, but they were in what was French territory at that time.

  23. “Paul on December 9, 2021 at 7:53 am said:
    I’m glad that Andy at least acknowledges that Richard Spencer, Gary North, and Ryan Ramsey exemplify what it means to be a real libertarian. Maybe Andy is not all that bad after all? I understand what some people are saying here about him being an undercover Zionist, and while I do urge caution, I can’t jump to that conclusion right away.”

    Richard Spencer is NOT a libertarian. I know he claimed to be a long time ago, but if he ever was, he obviously abandoned libertarianism a long time ago.

    If I did not comment on Richard Spencer above that was a mistake. He is NOT a libertarian. I have to wonder if he is a fed, given some of his strange behavior, like endorsing the obviously terrible Joe Biden for President. Why would he do that when it would seem to go against his own self interest? If he’s not a fed, maybe he’s an opportunist, or an accelerationist, as in he want to accelerate the destruction of the country.

    Now as for Ryan Ramsey, I heard a lot of stuff about him for awhile, but I had never really looked into him until a couple of years ago. I read several of his articles on his website and watched some of his videos. He sounded like a libertarian to me from what I read and heard him say.

    I know Gary North’s articles have been carried on LewRockwell.com for a long time. I have read some of his articles, but it is not like I am an expert on the guy. I think he is a libertarian, but LewRockwell.com does sometimes post articles from people who are not libertarians, like Pat Buchanan. I seem to recall some people claiming that Gary North supported stoning sinners, or something like that, and they were using that to say that he’s not a libertarian. I would have to look more into Gary North and do an evaluation for myself.

  24. You’re right. Just because Gary North wants a theocratic society that stones homosexuals and adulterers to death doesn’t mean he’s not a true libertarian. Maybe you have the makings of a future Zionist after all. The biblical Zionists had that form of government, and did those things to people who broke biblical laws about sex. So we need to keep an open mind here, obviously.

  25. Robert Norman said: “You’re already on thin ice because 1. The last name you don’t like to post sounds like a Zionist, even though you say it’s not, 2. You are not a Trump supporter, 3. You continue to defend your vote for Marxist BLM Jo Jo and her neocon Zionist sidekick, 4. You were closely associated with known Zionist agent Frankel for year’s and may have just faked your split from him once it became too obvious that he is a paid Zionist troll.”

    Jacobs is not necessarily a Jewish name. It is a surname shared by different groups.

    https://www.houseofnames.com/jacobs-family-crest

    From the article: “Jacobs is an ancient Anglo-Saxon surname that came from the baptismal name Jacob. The surname Jacobs referred to the son of Jacob which belongs to the category of patronymic surnames.

    ‘The medieval surname was not Jewish. Jacob is found before the Conquest as the name of an ecclesiastic. After the Conquest, it is impossible to decide how common the name was as the Latin Jacobus was used for both Jacob and James.'”

  26. I would love to see Ryan Ramsey and Andy Jacobs interview each other or engage in an open, published dialogue. Maybe someone can invite Mr. RAMSEY here or have it on another prestigious forum.

  27. “Andy Milnes on December 9, 2021 at 8:15 am said:
    I would love to see Ryan Ramsey and Andy Jacobs interview each other or engage in an open, published dialogue. Maybe someone can invite Mr. RAMSEY here or have it on another prestigious forum.”

    I would actually like to interview Ryan Ramsey for my YouTube channel. I heard people talk a lot of crap about that guy, but I liked most of what he said in the articles that I read and videos I heard from him. I will try to get in touch with him at some point down the road.

    I am NOT necessarily endorsing him or not endorsing him. I am just saying that from what I read and heard from him, I mostly agreed with him. I am not an expert on the guy.

  28. “Nathan Jacobs on December 9, 2021 at 8:11 am said:
    You’re right. Just because Gary North wants a theocratic society that stones homosexuals and adulterers to death doesn’t mean he’s not a true libertarian. Maybe you have the makings of a future Zionist after all. The biblical Zionists had that form of government, and did those things to people who broke biblical laws about sex. So we need to keep an open mind here, obviously.”

    This is coming through your filter, and I am not going to assume that your filter is accurate.

    I have heard lots of people lie about or distort/misrepresent the views of others, like Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Ron Paul, Alex Jones, etc… So I am going to reserve judgment on Mr. North until I do more investigation into his him myself.

  29. “Troll Tide Troll on December 9, 2021 at 8:22 am said:
    Make it happen! SOONER THE BETTOR!”

    Just to be clear, I am willing to interview, or debate, people with whom I have disagreements with as well.

    There are lots of interviews I’d like to conduct, and lots of other videos I’d like to make.

  30. Go ahead and investigate. I’m eagerly awaiting the results of your investigation.

  31. Looking forward, to your interviews and videos! I’d really love to see Ryan Ramsey interview you, as well.

  32. “Nathan Saturn on December 9, 2021 at 8:27 am said:
    Looking forward, to your interviews and videos! I’d really love to see Ryan Ramsey interview you, as well.”

    You probably the same person posting under multiple fake names in this thread.

  33. Would that make what he said any less valid if he is? How would one calculate such probabilities, and how would anyone disprove such accusations, if that is even possible?

  34. I don’t know why Andy does not produce more investigations and videos. I think they could be very educational and informative.

  35. “William Jacobs on December 9, 2021 at 8:58 am said:
    Would that make what he said any less valid if he is? How would one calculate such probabilities, and how would anyone disprove such accusations, if that is even possible?”

    You are probably playing multiple characters on this thread.

  36. “Jimmy Patterson on December 9, 2021 at 9:02 am said:
    I don’t know why Andy does not produce more investigations and videos. I think they could be very educational and informative.”

    I would like to start getting more videos out at some point down the road.

  37. “William Jacobs on December 9, 2021 at 8:58 am said:
    Would that make what he said any less valid if he is? How would one calculate such probabilities, and how would anyone disprove such accusations, if that is even possible?”

    If you are talking about Gary North, I would have to see what the context was in those comments. Lots of people have lied or misinterpreted things said by people, and then spread that this misinformation around.

  38. “Paul Norman on December 9, 2021 at 9:28 am said:
    Why down the road? What’s holding you back?”

    I have to get a new video camera for one thing. My video camera, which was out of date anyway, got smashed while traveling are year or so ago, and I have yet to replace it. I have had to use the camera on my computer, or my cell phone camera since then, neither of which are ideal.

  39. Ok, you should probably go ahead and look up Gary North comments. Let us know what you discover, please.

  40. Libertarians have definitely made progress. There was a time when people asked: “What’s a Libertarian?”

    Now, everyone knows what a Libertarian is.

  41. Libertarianism was invented by Murray Rothbard. Everybody knows that. Ron Paul and Lew Rockwell round out the libertarian holy trinity. People who don’t follow them and claim to be libertarians are fake libertarians. Real libertarians are into blood and soil, and stoning heretics, non-believers, blasphemers, rebellious children, adulterers and perverts.

    They believe that leftists and the genetically inferior should be physically removed, so to speak, perhaps by being dropped out of helicopters. They support a hierarchical, patriarchal theocratic order ruled by property owning men, surrounded by obedient women, children, and servants.

    There’s a lot more, but those are some of the main defining characters of what a real libertarian is. Obviously that’s nothing like the fake libertarians like Gary Johnson and his supporters in New Mexico, Reason, Cato, C4SS, etc, etc.

  42. Nathan Richardson, a probably combination of Nathan Norman and Darcy Richardson.

    You are obviously making absurd statements in order to smear Murray Rothbard, Ron Paul, and Lew Rockwell.

  43. No, I venerate them. You are blaspheming against them by suggesting that they did not create libertarian philosophy. And blasphemers must get stoned to death. Sorry, Andy, but that includes you.

  44. I recall when Time Magazine identified Lyndon LaRouche as a Libertarian.

    I think that that is the point after which everyone became an expert on what libertarianism is.

  45. Nathan Norman supports the ideas of larouche and ran for the LIBERTARIAN PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION so maybe Time was just ahead.

  46. The term “libertarian” has been around quite awhile, and has been used in several different contexts. The earliest occurrence of the term is in philosophy, and was used to identify a belief in free will.

    The term “libertarisnism” seems to have been popularized first by Jerome Tucille in his book Radical Libertarianism, which came out in 1970.

  47. I’m clearly a leftist pretending to be a libertarian. Actually real libertarians are far right and can’t stand leftism, perverts, heretics, blasphemy, race mixing, Zionism, secularism, feminism, girly men, the sound of Spanish, excessive melanin, liberals, democrats, egalitarianism, and other crimes against God.

    They seek a European based ethnoanarchy of a feudal, mercantilism, agrarian character, satisfy their sexual urges by shooting off their big guns, enjoy wearing tinfoil hats and listen to Alex Jones all day, fly their Trump flags, and love a strong, manly leader like Putin, Trump, Lukashenko, or Duterte.

    If you had any doubts about what a real libertarian is, now you know.

  48. What are you saying? Is he a photographer who shoots huge loads of photos? Or maybe he’s a marksman who shoots guns a lot?

  49. There’s a ton of fake libertarians. Gary Johnson and Bill Weld and Marxist Jo and neocon Cohen made it worse.

  50. A real libertarian supports and votes for Stein Thurmond, David Duke, Pat Buchanan, Joe McCarthy, Joe Sobran, Donald Trump, Roy Moore, and you get the idea.

  51. There are also exemplary foreign leaders from Pinochet to Putin, strong men that a real libertarian admires. And let’s not forget great writers like Sam Francis.

  52. “Rothbard-Rockwell Report on December 9, 2021 at 11:43 pm said:
    There are also exemplary foreign leaders from Pinochet to Putin, strong men that a real libertarian admires. And let’s not forget great writers like Sam Francis.”

    This sounds like it could be a Paul troll comment.

  53. “Rothbard-Rockwell Report on December 9, 2021 at 11:38 pm said:
    A real libertarian supports and votes for Stein Thurmond, David Duke, Pat Buchanan, Joe McCarthy, Joe Sobran, Donald Trump, Roy Moore, and you get the idea.”

    This sounds like it could be a Paul troll comment.

  54. No, they are not troll comments, you hypocritical false flag patriot. They are actually candidates and people supported by Rothbard and Rockwell over the years. Real libertarians are followers of Rothbard, Rockwell, Ron Paul, Hoppe, and the Mises Institute. Others claiming to be libertarians are fake libertarians. Real libertarians embrace the candidates, political leaders, foreign leaders and writers embraced by Rothbard and Rockwell.

  55. Yeah, I told you all that Andy Jacobs is not a real libertarian. The evidence keeps mounting.

    1. He has a suspicious surname. Sure, he has an explanation for it, but how do we know he is telling the truth? It seems too convenient that he never posts his last name or even answer questions as to what it is. Remember, the Talmud says it’s ok for Zionists to lie to gentile. I would not be surprised if he’s lying.

    2. He was practically married to the commie Zionist (((cyberpig))) for many years. Now that the (((cyberpig))) has been indisputably proven to be a paid commie Zionist troll, he claims they had a falling out. BUT should we believe him?

    3. He voted for Marxist BLM JO JO and neocon Zionist (((COHEN))) over the greatest President we ever had, with the possible exception of Andrew Jackson,thus helping the chicoms steal the election for their puppet Sleepy Dementia Joe Biden in the key state of Pennsylvania. And it was no thanks to him that Hillary Clinton’s attempt to steal the election was thwarted in 2016!

    4. What’s more, he continues to defend these crimes against our nation and his failure to support our true President and leader, TRUMP! When it comes to the war to Save America, Andy Jacobs is a deserter who has repeatedly given aid and comfort to the enemy!

    5. He calls real libertarianism trolling, even though he pretends to defend real libertarianism almost all the time. But at times like this, his mask slips a bit, and we see the true LEFTIST Zionist commie demon underneath.

  56. “Real libertarians are followers of Rothbard, Rockwell, Ron Paul, Hoppe, and the Mises Institute.”

    There is truth to this statement. There is not a lot of truth is other stuff this troll says.

  57. “1. He has a suspicious surname. Sure, he has an explanation for it, but how do we know he is telling the truth? It seems too convenient that he never posts his last name or even answer questions as to what it is. Remember, the Talmud says it’s ok for Zionists to lie to gentile. I would not be surprised if he’s lying.”

    I have to wonder if this is an Jewish internet troll. Perhaps one born in the former Soviet Union, who has spent a lot of time, and may currently be living, in Alabama.

  58. I’m not a troll, but I suspect Andy Jacobs is. Which part isn’t true? He, it anyone, can go word for word and show one thing I said which isn’t true. Can Andy point to a single falsehood in what I said? Take just one and prove it to be false? I don’t think so.

  59. I have to wonder if Andy Jacobs is a Zionist internet troll. I gave actually concrete reasons to suspect that he is. All he has done is ask whether I am, without providing a shred of evidence. It’s a traditional tactic of commie Zionist trolls like Andy Jacobs, especially ones who false flag themselves as patriots as he has done, to point the finger at their accusers and try to turn the accusations around so as to create confusion and try to deflect suspicion away from themselves.

    Notice however that actions speak louder than words. His surname is a fact, his explanation could be a lie, and his efforts to conceal it elevate suspicion. His long standing association with the (((cyberpig))) is a fact; their brake up could be subterfuge now that the (((cyberpig))) has been exposed. Him helping the chicoms destroy our freedom by stealing the election and installing their puppet Biden through his vote for Marxist Jo in a key state is a fact. His excuse is BS. Him calling real libertarianism trolling is just icing on the cake. At this point no further proof may even be needed.

  60. “Robert Norman” doesn’t even post under his real name. He keeps popping up here under different fake names. Why should anyone take him seriously when he lacks the courage to post under his real name, or to appear somewhere in person where we can verify his existence. You want to see me in person? I am in multiple videos on YouTube. I have been to numerous Libertarian Party conventions, meetings, and events. I was at Anarchapulco in Mexico in 2018, and you can see me in videos from there on YouTube. Unlike you, I am NOT hiding. You are a coward.

  61. “He voted for Marxist BLM JO JO and neocon Zionist (((COHEN))) over the greatest President we ever had, with the possible exception of Andrew Jackson,thus helping the chicoms steal the election for their puppet Sleepy Dementia Joe Biden in the key state of Pennsylvania. And it was no thanks to him that Hillary Clinton’s attempt to steal the election was thwarted in 2016!”

    Jo Jorgensen is not a Marxist, and I’m not sure that it is fair to call Spike Cohen a neo-con. Yes, he was a neo-con years ago, but he appears to have left that behind.

    And fyi, I’m not sure that Spike is actually fully Jewish. I heard recently that his mother is not Jewish, so under Jewish Law, he is not a Jew, even though his father is Jewish, because Jewish Law only recognizing the mother as determining whether on not somebody is Jewish.

    I thought that David Lee Roth, of Van Halen fame, was Jewish for years, and I read somewhere that only his father is Jewish, not his mother. So he’s a half Jew, but not recognized by other Jews as a Jew. So maybe Spike Cohen is like David Lee Roth.

    https://www.jpost.com/us-elections/meet-the-messianic-jew-running-for-vice-president-in-the-us-elections-647536

    From the article: “In an interview with Blake Fox earlier this year, Cohen said, ‘I should note two things that may disqualify me as Jewish to many of your readers: I was raised as a Messianic Jew, and my mother is a Gentile.

    ‘I am a Cohen, which is passed patrilineally, and had a Jewish upbringing, kept Shabbat and all the holidays and days of remembrance, proudly proclaimed my Jewish identity in the deep South my whole life, and continue to do so today. Still, to the standards of many Jews, they would not consider me Jewish,” he continued. “I did have a bar mitzvah, and attended a Hebrew preschool.’

    He told Fox that Judaism has had a ‘big impact” on his political identity. He said he is influenced by Maimonides and Hillel and that the Jews that helped shape his political beliefs are Walter Block, Murray Bookchin, Emma Goldman and Murray Rothbard.”

    MY COMMENT: THESE INFLUENCES WOULD BE BETTER IF HE TOOK EMMA GOLDMAN AND MURRAY BOOKCHIN OUT. This sheds some light on Spike’s leftist leanings. Spike should be more like Walter Block and Murray Rothbard and forget Emma Goldman and Murray Bookchin.

    Spike is married to a non-Jewish black woman. This would be frowned upon by a lot of Jews.

  62. https://jewishornot.blogspot.com/2011/12/is-david-lee-roth-jewish.html

    From the article: “Yes, David Lee Roth is a Jew. The lead singer of Van Halen was raised Jewish by his Jewish father Nathan Roth, an ophthalmologist, and his non-Jewish mother Sibyl Roth.”

    MY COMMENT: I suppose this gets down to how do you want to define somebody as being Jewish, but given that David Lee Roth’s mother is not Jewish, he is not Jewish under Jewish Law, and would not be recognized as being Jewish by a lot of Jews.

  63. “Robert Norman on December 10, 2021 at 6:37 am said:
    I have to wonder if Andy Jacobs is a Zionist internet troll.”

    Said “Robert Norman,” the internet troll.

  64. ““Robert Norman” doesn’t even post under his real name. He keeps popping up here under different fake names.”

    It’s your unproven presumption that I “keep popping up here under different names.” You have produced no evidence whatsoever that this is true. For that matter, you haven’t proven that I don’t post under my real name. I haven’t said whether I do or don’t, and it’s not relevant to the questions raised here about you, which it’s pretty obvious that you are trying to deflect from.

    “Why should anyone take him seriously when he lacks the courage to post under his real name, or to appear somewhere in person where we can verify his existence.”

    You haven’t shown any evidence whether I am posting under my real name or not. There are many reasons why someone may want to be anonymous or pseudonymous, and there’s no need to go over them here. You are also hypocritical on this question, because your “proof” of who you are, at least so far, is laughable. You don’t even post your last name, or answer what it is when people ask you. This thread is the first time I’ve seen you even acknowledge it. But who you are and whether you are a real person is much less relevant than whether you are a paid Zionist commie agent internet troll. It is possible to do all those things under your real name, and your defense against the charges that that is what you are in fact doing is rather weak right now.

    Again: Notice however that actions speak louder than words. His surname is a fact, his explanation could be a lie, and his efforts to conceal it elevate suspicion. His long standing association with the (((cyberpig))) is a fact; their brake up could be subterfuge now that the (((cyberpig))) has been exposed. Him helping the chicoms destroy our freedom by stealing the election and installing their puppet Biden through his vote for Marxist Jo in a key state is a fact. His excuse is BS. Him calling real libertarianism trolling is just icing on the cake. At this point no further proof may even be needed.

    “You want to see me in person? I am in multiple videos on YouTube.”

    A vague and unverifiable claim. For it to be anything more than a throwaway line, you need to say exactly which videos. If they are long videos, you need to also provide a time stamp. Then if you did those things, which you have not, how would we know that you are that person?

    “I have been to numerous Libertarian Party conventions, meetings, and events.”

    Another vague and unverifiable claim. For it to mean anything you would need exact specifics and ways to verify that you are telling the truth. In other words the URL addresses of the exact videos and time stamps to verify that you were there, and how to know that you are the person in those videos that you claim to be. Again, you have not done that, but even if you did – you could still be a paid agent of the international commie conspiracy, the elders of Zion, the new world order, the ZOG, or whoever is paying you. All it would mean if you did prove that you are a real person is that your false flag infiltration activities are not limited to the internet, but the charges against you still stand.

    “Unlike you, I am NOT hiding.”

    Yes you are. You don’t post your last name, and don’t answer questions about it when asked. Your “proof” of your identity is always extremely vague. But even if you’re not hiding, you can still be a traitor, mole, infiltrator, fifth columnist, false flag – there are many terms for what you are. I say you’re guilty, and I’ve provided evidence. That evidence is either valid, or it’s not. Who I am is a deflection from whether it is or not, which is exactly why you choose to focus on something of secondary relevance, if any at all.

    If I was the worst thing you can say about me, this would still be true about you:

    Again: Notice however that actions speak louder than words. His surname is a fact, his explanation could be a lie, and his efforts to conceal it elevate suspicion. His long standing association with the (((cyberpig))) is a fact; their brake up could be subterfuge now that the (((cyberpig))) has been exposed. Him helping the chicoms destroy our freedom by stealing the election and installing their puppet Biden through his vote for Marxist Jo in a key state is a fact. His excuse is BS. Him calling real libertarianism trolling is just icing on the cake. At this point no further proof may even be needed.

  65. ““Robert Norman on December 10, 2021 at 6:37 am said:
    I have to wonder if Andy Jacobs is a Zionist internet troll.”

    Said “Robert Norman,” the internet troll.”

    Said “Andy,” the internet troll.

    1. You have not proven that I am an internet troll. You’ve alleged that I post under a fake name, but provided no evidence. You alleged that I post under multiple names, but provided no evidence. If you somehow proved those things to be true, it would just mean that I am anonymous, not that I am a troll. Many trolls are anonymous, but many trolls are not anonymous, and many people who choose to be anonymous for a wide variety of reasons are not trolls.

    2. If you somehow proved that I am an internet troll, it wouldn’t make the charges against you any less true. You wouldn’t be any less of an internet troll if you somehow proved that I am one too. And if you provided real proof that you are a real person, instead of the vague and unproven assertions you typically throw out, it wouldn’t prove that you are not an internet troll either. It would only show that your “trolling” or treason or infiltration/mole/spy/false flag activities extend to more than just the internet.

    Your response only further proves that you are guilty of that. Pointing the finger back and focusing on who is or isn’t posting under their real name is all nothing but deflection from whether you are a mole or not. Which is exactly what you would expect a mole to say in response.

  66. “Jo Jorgensen is not a Marxist”

    Yes she is. She supports Burn Loot Murder. Burn Loot Murder is Marxist. She is a Marxist.

    “I’m not sure that it is fair to call Spike Cohen a neo-con. Yes, he was a neo-con years ago, but he appears to have left that behind.”

    “Appears” is the key word there. He was born a zionist. He is a “made man” zionist. He will always be a zionist. Zionists are blood in, blood out. They don’t just let people out. It’s like quitting the mafia. You also “appear” to be a real libertarian. I have provided evidence that you are not. Evidence which you keep trying to deflect from, thus only further proving that it’s true. You “appear” to have separated from your other half, the (((cyberpig))), but this could just be for appearance. Actions speak louder than words.

    You had the chance to keep America great. You chose to vote for these false flag “libertarians” and thus, helped sell out America to the Chinese commies. By helping them steal the election and put in their puppet Biden. In a key state. What possible excuse could there be for this act of treason? That Trump is not perfect enough for you? What a crock of crap.

  67. Interesting deflection from Andy about whether or not Jeremy “Spike” COHEN is Jewish. Andy has made a big deal about some people being “Jewish” who are likewise either Jewish or not Jewish depending on how you define Jewish.

  68. A real libertarian supports and votes for Strom Thurmond, David Duke, Pat Buchanan, Joe McCarthy, Joe Sobran, Donald Trump, Roy Moore, and you get the idea. There are also exemplary foreign leaders from Pinochet to Putin, strong men that a real libertarian admires. And let’s not forget great writers like Sam Francis. They are actually candidates and people supported by Rothbard and Rockwell over the years.

    Real libertarians are followers of Rothbard, Rockwell, Ron Paul, Hoppe, and the Mises Institute. Others claiming to be libertarians are fake libertarians. Real libertarians embrace the candidates, political leaders, foreign leaders and writers embraced by Rothbard and Rockwell.

    I’m not a troll, but I suspect Andy Jacobs is. Which part isn’t true? He, it anyone, can go word for word and show one thing I said which isn’t true. Can Andy point to a single falsehood in what I said? Take just one and prove it to be false? I don’t think so. Notice that he hasn’t even tried? I didn’t think he can prove anything I said is wrong, and he’s proving me to be correct.

  69. I may be a “Zionist Agent”, but like Spike, I am only sorta Jewish, in many ways less Jewish than he is.

  70. My father is not Jewish. His mother was Methodist and of English and Scottish ancestry. His father was of Flemish (Belgian Dutch) and Spanish ancestry (Spanish from Spain, and through his mother). He was raised Christian, Catholic I think, but prettu much never attended church. My father attended Methodist churches with his mother while growing up.

  71. As a principal living co-founder of the Libertarian party, I could be a real libertarian.
    BTW, personal gossip will not get anyone on the ballot. If one wants to abolish all ballot access censorship laws, then one could be a radical libertarian.
    BTW, I have some Cherokee ancestry. All y’all Eurasians get the hell off my lawn.

  72. Genetic studies have shown that the ancestors of the people known today as Native Americans or American Indians crossed a land bridge from Siberia to Russia to get to North America.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.