On October 2, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear Libertarian Party of New York v New York State Board of Elections, 22-893. This continues a pattern in which the Court has refused to hear all cert petitions filed by minor parties or independent candidates on ballot access, since 1991 when it agreed to hear Norman v Reed.
Also on October 2, the Court refused to hear Mazo v Way, 22-1033, the New Jersey case over ballot labels for primary candidates.
UPDATE: here is an article about the rejection of the New Jersey case.
FURTHER UPDATE: here is a news story about the New York refusal.
SAME OLDE BAAAADE CONLAW ARGUMENTS >>>
SAME OLDE CERT DEN
—-
WILL RFK2 BALLOT ACCESS LAWYERS BE COMPETENT ???
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2023/09/29/another-suit-to-disqualify-trump-under-constitutions-insurrection-clause-filed-in-michigan/71003773007/
Another suit to disqualify Trump under the Constitution’s ‘insurrection’ clause is filed in Michigan
—
WHEN WILL SCOTUS TAKE A 14-3 CASE ???
I think the original challege was framed wrong and set them up to not be heard. This should have been a 1A case from the start. What right does the state have dictating that an association express any opinion. By forcing a political party to run a national candidate they are forcing speech.
Scotus will use 14-3 arguments against Trump as toilet paper. President Trump will reward SCOTUS once back in office.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-supreme-court-not-hear-151025787.html
14-3 CASES ALL DEAD ???????
Of course.
The 14th Amendment should be used to disqualify Donald Trump as a candidate for any federal office. He is the greatest threat to American democracy, the rule of law, and the UNITED States of America.
You are mixing up Trump and Biden.
What fascist police state?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-supreme-court-spurns-former-135849804.html
EASTMAN – TRUMP ROBOT