U.S. District Court Judge John Koeltl will hear Libertarian Party of New York v New York State Board of Elections, 1:20cv-5820, on Tuesday, December 21. This is the challenge to the 2020 ballot access changes in New York, which moved the statewide independent petition, and the petition for the nominees of unqualified parties, from 15,000 signatures to 45,000. It also changed the definition of a party from one that polled 50,000 votes for Governor, to one that polled 2% for the office at the top of the ballot in the last election.
At the hearing, attorneys for the state will try to persuade the judge to uphold the laws, without benefit of a trial. They will argue that the constitutionality of the new laws are so clear, no more evidence is needed. The state’s briefs in this case so far have many factual errors. Their expert submitted a report on the independent candidate laws of every state, but he neglected to mention that 39 states have separate laws on how new parties may qualify. That is why the state’s expert said that, in California, the petitioning period is only 105 days. He ignored the fact that the procedure for a new party to get on the ballot may take as long as the activists need, even years. For example, the California Libertarian Party took seven years to accumulate enough registered voters to qualify for the ballot, between 1972 and 1979.
The state’s expert also made factual errors even concerning each state’s independent petition period. For example, he said that Oregon has a short window to collect independent candidate signatures. Actually Oregon allows an unlimited amount of time to collect independent signatures. The state’s expert confused the concept of a start date for petitioning, with the earliest date on which an independent petition can be submitted.