U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Pennsylvania Lawsuits Filed by Former President Trump, and the Republican Party, Over the 2020 Election

On February 22, the U.S. Supreme Court revealed that it will not hear four pending Pennsylvania cases filed by former President Donald Trump, or his campaign, or the Republican Party, over the 2020 election returns.

Still pending are two similar cases from other states. They will be considered on the Court’s March 5 conference. They are 20-887, Wood v Raffensperger, a Georgia case; and 20-883, Trump v Wisconsin Elections Commission, a Wisconsin case.

The four denied Pennsylvania cases are 20-542, 20-574, 20-845, and 20-810. Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the court’s refusal to hear the first two. He wrote an eleven-page dissent arguing the Court should have heard them. Justices Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito also dissented from the Court’s refusal to hear those two; they wrote their own separate four-page dissent.

On February 22, the U.S. Supreme Court also refused to hear the Michigan Republican case concerning the election results, but it would have been extraordinary if the Court had accepted that one, because that case has not even been heard yet in the U.S. Court of Appeals. King v Whitmer, 20-815. Also on February 22, the Court refused to hear another Trump Wisconsin election case, 20-882.

U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Minnesota Presidential Primary Ballot Access Lawsuit

On February 22, the U.S. Supreme Court revealed that it will not hear De La Fuente v Simon, 20-612, the challenge to the Minnesota law that gives a political party complete control over which presidential primary candidates may appear on that party’s presidential primary ballot. Such laws are rare; the only other states with similar laws are Florida and Georgia. The Court has never heard a presidential primary ballot access case.

U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Challenge to North Carolina Independent Petition Deadline

On February 22, the U.S. Supreme Court revealed that it won’t hear Kopitke v Bell, 20-897, the challenge to the North Carolina independent presidential petition deadline of March 3. That deadline, created in 2018, violates the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1983 decision Anderson v Celebrezze, which struck down Ohio’s March 20 deadline.

The result will create disorder if there is a presidential candidate running outside the major parties in future elections who doesn’t begin his or her campaign until the election year itself.

The court’s action continues its 30-year unbroken record of denying all cert petitions filed by minor party and independent candidates on ballot access. It is as though every member of the U.S. Supreme Court has silently concluded that the constitution does not apply to the voting rights of persons who wish to vote for candidates other than Democratic and Republican nominees.

Virginia Constitution Party Will Petition for Virginia Statewide 2021 Offices

The Virginia Constitution Party has nominated a full slate of statewide candidates, and is about to start petitioning to get them on the ballot. The Constitution Party has never before completed a statewide petition in Virginia, except for President. The nominees each need their own separate petition. They are Timothy Phipps for Governor, Sheila Tittle for Lieutenant Governor, and David A. McKelvey for Attorney General. Each petition needs 2,000 signatures.

The number of signatures was reduced last month by a lawsuit in state court. The number of signatures is lower this year than at any time since 1969. Back before 1970, the statewide non-presidential petitions was 250 signatures.