Arizona Republican Party State Chair’s Lawsuit, Filed in U.S. Supreme Court on December 11, Has Had No Action

On December 11, Kelli Ward, the state chair of the Arizona Republican Party, asked the U.S. Supreme Court to declare the 1887 federal electoral vote act unconstitutional. Ward v Jackson, 20-809. The U.S. Supreme Court has not taken any action on her case. She appeals from a decision of the Arizona Supreme Court. In the original case she filed, she said said that the state courts must allow more time for her to find evidence of voter fraud. The original proceeding in the state trial court set a trial date only two days after the case was filed, and now she argues that the trial date was too soon for her to prove that Arizona voter fraud occurred on November 3.

Her basis for arguing that the 1887 federal electoral vote act is unconstitutional is based on her belief that the 1887 law interferes with the ability of individuals to find instances of voter fraud. Here is her filing.

Nebraska Still Hasn’t Finished Checking Signatures for Legal Marijuana Now Party

In September 2020, the Legal Marijuana Now Party submitted a petition in Nebraska to become a qualified party. The state still hasn’t finished checking the signatures. Assuming the party has enough valid signatures, it will be added as a choice on the voter registration forms. Currently the only qualified parties in Nebraska are Republican, Democratic, and Libertarian. No one can register into a party in Nebraska that has never been a qualified party.

Trump or His Supporters Still Have At Least Three Cases Seeking Review in U.S. Supreme Court

There appear to be at least three pending cases in the U.S. Supreme Court that were filed by President Trump or his supporters, concerning vote-counting.

Two are from Wisconsin. Trump v Biden, 20-882, was filed December 29 and appeals a decision of the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Trump v Wisconsin Election Commission, 20-883, was filed December 30 and appeals a decision of the Seventh Circuit.

One is from Georgia: Lin Wood v Raffensperger, 20-887, was filed December 30. The plaintiff, attorney Lin Wood, claims standing because Wood is a Georgia voter. It argues that Georgia treated postal voters better than in-person voters.

If anyone knows of other such cases, please comment. So far the U.S. Supreme Court has not acted on any of these three.