Vox, an on-line news source with over 33,000,000 readers, has this article by Jane Coaston on the Libertarian Party’s showing in the 2020 presidential election. Thanks to Gene Berkman for the link.
On November 13, the Montana Green Party filed this reply brief in the Ninth Circuit in Montana Green Party v Stapleton, 20-35340. This is the 2018 lawsuit against the unequal Montana distribution requirement for the petition to recognize a new party. The law requires a varying number of signatures from each of 34 state house districts. The districts are all approximately equal in population, yet the law requires 55 signatures from some districts and 150 in other districts, and varying numbers in-between for still other districts.
Unequal distribution requirements for statewide petitions are unconstitutional under a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court opinion, Moore v Ogilvie, and such unequal distribution requirements have been struck down over the years in Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Michigan, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Wyoming.
Every day more votes are counted. The New York Times has this running tally for the Democratic, Republican, Libertarian, and Green presidential nominees. As of November 13 it now shows Jo Jorgensen above 1,800,000.
California had two statewide ballot measures on the ballot this month that relate to voter eligibility. Proposition 17 passed. It lets individuals on parole register to vote, and passed with 59%. Proposition 18 failed. It would have let individuals who will be age 18 at the time of the general election also register and vote in the preceding primary. In presidential years there is eight months between the primary and the general election, so if it had passed, in presidential years over half of all 17-year-olds would have been able to vote in primaries.
Here are the election returns. They are not complete but the margins for those two measures are so overwhelming, it is possible to predict the outcome.
The U.S. Supreme Court has assigned a case number to Level the Playing Field v Federal Election Commission: 20-649. The response of the FEC is due December 14. It is highly likely that the FEC will ask for more time to respond. This is the case over presidential general election debates.