U.S. Supreme Court Hasn’t Yet Issued an Order in Ohio Initiative Petition Case

As of mid-morning on June 25, Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court hasn’t issued any order in Thompson v Dewine, 19A1054. This is the case over whether the health crisis justifies some petitioning relief for Ohio statewide initiatives. The U.S. District Court had granted relief, but the Sixth Circuit had reversed that. All the briefs have been before the U.S. Supreme Court since mid-day, June 22, Monday.

It appears the only full U.S. Supreme Court opinion issued, or to be issued, on June 25, is an immigration case. Probably next week will see the presidential elector cases.

U.S. District Court Dismisses Texas Democratic Lawsuit to Restore the Straight-Ticket Device

On June 24, U.S. District Court Judge Marina Garcia Marmolejo, an Obama appointee, dismissed the lawsuit Bruni v Hughs, s.d., 5:20cv-35. This is the case in which the Texas Democratic Party tried to persuade the court to restore the straight-ticket device that the legislature repealed in 2018.

The order says the plaintiffs lack standing. They had argued that without the straight-ticket device, voters would spend more time in the voting booth, leading to longer lines of people waiting to vote. The decision says that is speculative and the Democrats have no concrete injury. Thanks to Linda Curtis for the link.

Texas State Appeals Court Hears Case on Whether Convention Party Candidates Must Pay Filing Fees

On June 23, the Texas State Appeals Court heard Dikeman v Hughs, 14-19-00969, a Libertarian Party lawsuit that challenges the 2019 law that says candidates seeking the nomination of a party that nominates by convention must pay a filing fee. The law is not clear. Most people would probably read it to mean that only the nominees of convention parties must pay the fee, but the Secretary of State says even people who say they want a convention nomination must pay it, in advance of the convention.

Ever since 1903, Texas law allowed parties that nominate by primary to charge a filing fee. The parties used this money to pay for administering their primary. Back then, only the Democratic Party had primaries. Members of other parties were never asked to pay any fee. In 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Texas filing fees, so the legislature changed the law to provide that the government would pay to administer primaries, and the government would get the revenue from the fees. But the 1973 law still had no provision for filing fees for parties that nominate by convention.

The hearing went well for the Libertarian Party. The three judges seem skeptical that the Secretary of State interpreted the 2019 law correctly. Thanks to Jim Riley for this news.

June 2020 Ballot Access News Print Edition

Ballot Access News
June 2020 – Volume 36, Number 1

This issue was printed on white paper.


Table of Contents

  1. FOUR MORE COURT DECISIONS EASE BALLOT ACCESS
  2. SEVEN STATES EASE BALLOT ACCESS ADMINISTRATIVELY
  3. NEW BALLOT ACCESS CASES FILED
  4. OTHER LAWSUIT NEWS
  5. PUERTO RICO WILL VOTE ON STATEHOOD
  6. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTOR CASES
  7. BOOK REVIEW: BREAKING THE TWO-PARTY DOOM LOOP
  8. CONSTITUTION PARTY NOMINATES
  9. LIBERTARIAN PARTY CONVENTION
  10. JUSTIN AMASH
  11. OTHER PARTY NOMINATIONS
  12. REFORM PARTY SETS CONVENTION
  13. MAJOR PARTY CONVENTIONS
  14. SUBSCRIBING TO BAN WITH PAYPAL