Sarasota, Florida Daily Newspaper Carries Op-Ed on Florida Top-Two Initiative

The Sarasota Herald-tribune has this op-ed by the chair of the Florida Republican Party about the top-two initiative that is likely to qualify for the Florida 2020 ballot. State Senator Joe Gruters correctly points out that the top-two initiative is not an initiative for an “open primary.” He also says that while proponents claim their initiative would promote centrist politics, that has not happened in California, which continues to have the most polarized legislature in the nation after nine years of the top-two system.

Iowa State Trial Court Invalidates Some Restrictions for Voter ID

On October 1, an Iowa state trial court struck down parts of a 2017 law that requires voters to show ID at the polls. The law had provided that Iowans with a state drivers license or state ID card could automatically obtain a special voter card that would allow them to vote, if they showed that card. But the law said Iowans without a drivers license or state ID card could not obtain the special voter card automatically. The ruling says that all currently registered voters may obtain the special voter card automatically. Here is the opinion in League of United Latin American Citizens of Iowa v Pate, Polk Co., cv-05643.

South Carolina Republican Voters Sue Party over Cancellation of 2020 Presidential Primary

On October 1, two voters affiliated with the South Carolina Republican Party filed a lawsuit in state court against the state Republican Party. The party executive committee cancelled the presidential primary on September 7. The lawsuit points out that the state party rules clearly say that only the state convention can make that decision. See this story. Thanks to Political Wire for the link.

UPDATE: the case is Inglis v South Carolina Republican Party, filed in the Richland County Court of Common Pleas, 5th jud. circuit.

Final Brief Filed in Illinois Ballot Access Case

On September 27, the final brief was filed in Gill v Scholz in the Seventh Circuit. This is the case that challenges the 5% (of the last vote cast) petition for U.S. House candidates in the general election. The U.S. District Court had enjoined the law and allowed the plaintiff, independent candidate David Gill, to be on the ballot in 2016. Then the Seventh Circuit countermanded the relief with a single sentence, but did not explain why. After the election, the case was re-assigned to another U.S. District Court Judge, who upheld the 5% petition. Now the case is in the Seventh Circuit.